oyceter: Stack of books with text "mmm... books!" (mmm books)
The short review: I liked it better than The Grand Tour and still not quite as much as Sorcery and Cecelia.

Kate and Cecy manage to stumble across another magical mystery that threatens the nation, only this time, it's been ten years since the last book. Both of them have children and are settled nicely into their respective lives.

But something's going on with the new railways and leylines in the country, and while Cecy and James are up there investigating, more mysterious things are happening around Thomas' estate.

I really liked that Wrede and Stevermer returned to the letter format of the first book; the switch to diary and police record was one of my main problems with the second book. And Thomas and James are corresponding with each other as well! It was great getting a look into their relationship; one sometimes forgets that they were friends before meeting up with Cecy and Kate.

Also, Thomas and James are much more sardonic than Cecy and Kate. And it was a neat way to look at the two marriages and how they worked over the years.

I still rather miss the breezy, gossipy tone of the first book; there's less talk about balls and clothes and Seasons in this book, largely because Kate and Cecy are older and have different interests. There's much more talk of the children and running households, which is interesting in its own way. It's strange seeing characters growing older like this. I miss their younger selves, but I also appreciate who they've grown into and how they've matured.

Part of me is rather irritated that Cecy gets to run around and have adventures while Kate's stuck with the children, and I think it isn't because I think the traditionally feminine roles are useless. It's largely a plot split; a lot more action happens up where Cecy and James are, while much of what happens with Kate and Thomas ends up with Kate and Thomas being more reactive than proactive.

Still, I'd rec this to anyone who liked the first book. I miss these people and the world, and it was nice being able to go back.
oyceter: Stack of books with text "mmm... books!" (mmm books)
Life after the Flash, a nuclear, apocalyptic-type disaster (or something), is tough, particularly if you're a band of kids on board a paddle wheeler on the Mississippi. Tomcat and his fellow River Rats come and go, performing at towns and delivering mail for food and other goods. One day, they rescue King from the river, and in doing so, unleash a whole world of trouble on themselves.

I felt like I should have liked this book more than I did. There's nothing in particular that I disliked about it; I just read it when I was down and over a period of weeks, so I often forgot what happened before I picked it up again. As such, the narrative felt very disjointed, and I didn't have a very good sense of who the characters were. Mostly I kept comparing the book to other books (The Postman for the post-apocalyptic delivering of mail and the intrusion of pre-apocalyptic technology and War for the Oaks for the music elements). I dunno. I don't think it's very fair of me to write up the book right now, because I strongly suspect that my mood had something to do with the emotional disconnect.

Anyhow, I'll keep it instead of selling it and hope that a reread makes me like it more.

2004 book round up

Sun, Jan. 9th, 2005 02:11 pm
oyceter: teruterubouzu default icon (Calvin and Hobbes comics)
Heh, the ability to do this post was the reason behind why I started book blogging last year, and of course, now it's about a week late and I don't have much energy to write it. But write it I will.

I am shamelessly copying [livejournal.com profile] coffee_and_ink's format (I hope you don't mind, Mely), whose posts are the main reason why I started book blogging at all.

This being the inaugural year, I have no idea how this matches up to my reading habits of previous year. Just off the top of my head, I would say that I feel like I've read a great deal of books this year, and most of them good. A big reason for that is because of LJ, because of all the recs that have come in, and for that, I am eternally grateful. I read many things I wouldn't have touched previously because of that. And now, my ten favorite books of the year, out of all the books I have read this year (excluding rereads), not out of all the books published this year. They may not be the best books I've read this year, or the most technically proficient, or the like, but they are books that grabbed me somehow and will most likely end up being reread very often. I'm cheating quite a bit on this list and including multiple books by authors and such, but hey, it's my list ;).

Listed alphabetically by author. I've blogged each book before, which you can find in my book memories section, if you want to read me blather on even more.


  1. Megan Chance, Fall From Grace

    Both romances on this list are ones that push the boundaries of the genre. I love Megan Chance's romances because she doesn't bother to whitewash history; her characters are rarely the rareified nobility that populate most romances. In this book, they are outlaws, and there is no romance at all in the way Chance portrays their lives. She also inverts the trope and makes the hard-living, hard-hearted character the heroine, with a hero painfully in love with her. This is not a fuzzy romance; it's on the smothering of dreams and hopes, on the choices that life gradually takes away.


  2. Michael Dirda, Readings

    Dirda is a kindred spirit in the book world, although I can only sit back and wish that I have read as broadly and as deeply as he has, as well as wish that I could write about the experience of reading and of books so beautifully as he does. But I can't, so I am incredibly glad that he exists in the world and writes the reviews he does. His book reviews are like recommendations from a close friend.


  3. Dorothy Dunnett, The Lymond Chronicles

    If I had to pick just one book of them, it would be Pawn in Frankincense, where all the build-up of the previous three books comes to head in a tense climax that left me breathless. Dunnett is very often manipulative, I still don't like Lymond as a person, and Checkmate is pretty flawed, especially when you look at how Dunnett throws in every single romance cliche in the book, but the series as a whole is so large and epic and grand that they occupied a very sizeable chunk of my head and heart for a very long period of time. And despite the criticism, nothing I've read this year has swallowed me whole the same way this series did -- I read the first book over a few months, the second in a week, and by the time I had gotten to Checkmate, I had spent an entire week reading till 5 in the morning, and was so sleep-deprived that I went home sick from work and finished the last book at home in a frenzied rush.

    Also, it's hard to beat Dunnett for sheer amount of influence on other authors.

    The Lymond books consist of The Game of Kings, Queen's Play, The Disorderly Knights, Pawn in Frankincense, The Ringed Castle, and Checkmate


  4. Kij Johnson, Fudoki

    This book is set in the same universe as Johnson's first book, The Fox Woman, and it has the same delicate touch in bringing Heian Japan to life in a way that feels very authentic to me. Finally, a fantasy set in Asia that doesn't grate on my nerves. The setting, while wonderfully done, is just one of the many beautiful parts of this book. The narrative centered on the dying princess Harueme is elegaic and full of regrets; the one on the cat-turned-warrior-woman is properly sharp around the edges, with charming touches like dreams of rice balls. A very good book that leaves a lingering sense of mono no aware.


  5. Laura Kinsale, Shadowheart

    After I read this, I was nearly incoherent with glee over how it smashes romance genre tropes left and right, with the added bonus of sex scenes that don't just develop the characters, but are also so intrinsic to the plot and the meat of the book that it is unimaginable without them. While the plot in and of itself doesn't make too much sense (though it is much more coherent than many Kinsale plots), the heart of the book is in the character dynamics and the exploration of gender roles and issues of power and control. Also, Kinsale manages to do all this while writing a scorching romance.


  6. Maureen F. McHugh, China Mountain Zhang

    Science fiction set in a world where China has become the one superpower and America has turned socialist. Instead of using the set up to explore overtly political issues in a larger setting, McHugh chooses narrate from the POV of the titular character and a few of the other people in the world whose lives he affects, no matter how obliquely. Because of this, the book has a much more intimate tone, even while it explores the larger issues of race, ethnicity, and cultural authenticity without ever losing sight of its characters, who are always human first.

  7. Patricia A. McKillip, multiple novels

    I discovered Patricia McKillip this year, after many years of never understanding her books, and it has been a joy going through her backlist. It's probably unnecessary praising McKillip to most people who read this LJ, but for anyone who hasn't read her books, the beauty of the prose and the images, the clarity of the visual metaphors and, above all, the underlying humanity in all her characters have completely won me over. My favorite of her books, Winter Rose, is actually a reread, although I don't actually remember my first read of it at all.

    I read her The Riddlemaster of Hed trilogy, Alphabet of Thorn, The Book of Atrix Wolfe, The Changeling Sea, In the Forests of Serre, Ombria in Shadow, Song for the Basilisk, The Tower at Stony Wood, and Winter Rose this year.


  8. Azar Nafisi, Reading Lolita in Tehran

    While I wanted a non-Nafisi POV at times for balance, Nafisi's memoir is still an effective look at not only a woman's life in Iran, but also the importance of reading and imagination. For me, it works better as an investigation into why we read than a chronicle of post-revolution Iran, but that is largely because of the constraints of the memoir format. This book hit some very deep spots in me regarding questions of morality and art and why the great books are always revolutionary in some way. A perfect demonstration of how books at their best can push boundaries and shape the mind.


  9. Marjane Satrapi, Persepolis

    Like Nafisi's book, Satrapi's Persepolis is a memoir of the Islamic revolution in Iran; however, Persepolis is also a wonderful graphic novel with stark black-and-white art and an often bizarre sense of humor. Satrapi's memoir is much less overtly political than Nafisi's, and it is more effective for me because of that. Satrapi focuses on the commonplace, on the seemingly trifling changes that the revolutions causes, and because of this, the truly horrific things that happen in her country are made that much worse in context of the everyday. Smart, funny, and engaging.


  10. Patricia C. Wrede and Caroline Stevermer, Sorcery and Cecelia, or The Enchanted Chocolate Pot

    An epistolary fantasy Regency novel! This is the book that I've been pushing on all of my friends, to the point of buying a copy and bringing it all the way over to Taiwan just so I could make yet another person read it. There's something incredibly joyful about this book -- one can sense how much fun the authors had writing it, and it makes for a delightful reading experience.



Also recommended: Lloyd Alexander, the Westmark trilogy; Connie Brockway, The Bridal Season; Joan Jacobs Brumberg, Fasting Girls: The History of Anorexia Nervosa; Jennifer Crusie, Bet Me; Judy Cuevas, Bliss and Dance; Karen Cushman, Catherine, Called Birdy; Pamela Dean, the Secret Country trilogy; Patricia MacLachlan, The Facts and Fictions of Minna Pratt; Margaret Mahy, The Tricksters; Ellen Raskin, The Tattooed Potato and Other Clues; Carroll Smith-Rosenberg, Disorderly Conduct: Visions of Gender in Victorian America; Elizabeth A. Wein, The Winter Prince

ETA: Added more books to the also recced list, because I am hare-brained and forgot a few.

Total read: 167 (8 rereads)

Books finished in 2004 )
oyceter: Stack of books with text "mmm... books!" (mmm books)
I had a lot of fun reading this. Not quite as much fun as I had reading Sorcery and Cecelia, but I think much of that can be attributed to the lack of the epistolary format. Kate and Cecy are now married (to Thomas and James, respectively, not to each other), and all four of them are embarking on a Grand Tour of the Continent. Of course, this being Kate and Cecy, things happen.

I have to say, I loved the title: The Grand Tour, or The Purloined Coronation Regalia, being a revelation of matters of High Confidentiality and Greatest Importance, including extracts from the intimate diary of a Noblewoman and the sworn testimony of a Lady of Quality, which should give unfamiliar readers a pretty good taste of what the tone of the book is like. Kate and Cecy and Thomas and James galivant around while getting into all sorts of trouble, meet shady characters, along with the Duke of Wellington, and Kate and Cecy finally have a chance to go shopping in Paris.

The tone is a little different from Sorcery and Cecelia, not quite so comical largely because of the extracts from Kate's diary. Kate is much more insecure and unsure of herself in her diary than she is writing to Cecy, which makes sense. And it was very interesting reading the two writing about the same events from different angles. One of the things I missed, though, was the camaraderie between Kate and Cecy... because the book is taken up of Cecy's testimony and Kate's diary, there is much less interaction between the two, and I miss the friendliness and the sensed history behind all the letters they wrote to each other for Sorcery and Cecelia. So the strangest thing for me was that while the two were physically together throughout the book, unlike S&C, they felt more emotionally distant.

Links:
- [livejournal.com profile] coffeeandink's review
- [livejournal.com profile] rilina's review
oyceter: Stack of books with text "mmm... books!" (mmm books)
Note to self: Do not start books at midnight, unless they are treatises on physics, or the like.

So, yeah. I started this last night and could not put it down until I finished it. By now, you'd think I would have figured out not to do this to myself, but the books are just so tempting...

I giggled out loud a lot and all in all had a horribly good time reading this. The book never surprised me, but everything was just so nicely done, and the characters and the plot and the style were just madcap and silly enough that it didn't matter at all. While both Kate and Cecelia could have fallen into the stupid-heroine trap of being willful and constantly getting into horrible trouble, they didn't. And I just love the letter format (and was pleased at the end when I guessed which author had written which character correctly).

There's an enchanted chocolate pot, nefarious magician villains, cute guys, various charms, and assorted balls and other such going-ons.

And I loved the voices of Kate and Cecelia.

Is The Grand Tour out? Is it as good?

Now I feel an urge to reread Freedom and Necessity.

Links:
- [livejournal.com profile] rilina's review
- [livejournal.com profile] sophia_helix's review
oyceter: Stack of books with text "mmm... books!" (mmm books)
A College of Magics: I liked it, and I think I will like it even more when I reread it. It took me a while to get used to Greenlaw and to Faris in particular, but by the end of the book, I greatly liked her. The book itself is set in a sort of alternate Europe with magic and with some addition countries (Galazon, etc.). I liked many things, like the bomb-hat, and Jane in her sartorial glory (I have decided I kind of want to be Jane), and Tyrian ("glove to my hand" sniff). And Faris. I started out not quite knowing what to think of Faris, but by the end, I definitely liked her. I liked how she needed responsibility most of all. Stevermer I think also nicely sidesteps the entire Cinderella-esque fairy tale; while Faris gains a great deal more power than anticipated (by her, but probably not by the readers), she doesn't magically transform into some glorious beautiful being, despite Jane's clothing advice. And while she does manage to save the world, it's at high cost to herself.

Very high cost. And the love story proceeded nicely without overshadowing everything or being too unbelievable. Quibble (with spoilers): spoilers ) Small thing I liked was how Faris stuck to her guns in the not getting married thing -- reminded me of Susan in Freedom and Necessity.

Links:
- [livejournal.com profile] rilina's review

When the King Comes Home: set in the same world as A College of Magics, but I think it takes place before College... I spent a few moments wondering if Ludovic Nallaneen was in Faris' portrait gallery, but I don't remember, and by that time, I'd already returned College. It's an interesting take on the Arthur mythology, and I particularly like how her trilogy of people sort of manages to avoid some of the misunderstandings that annoy me the most about the Arthur legend. Good King Julian the 4th is Arthur and I can't remember the names of his queen and knight. Anyhow, through necromancy, Julian is called back along with his knight, and much chaos ensues in the kingdom. The thing I liked the most about this one, though, were the descriptions of Hail's training as an apprentice to an artist -- grinding colors and preparing canvases and everything. Apparently this is something I'm interested in, because I quite liked that bit in The Portrait too. Maybe I should go read Girl with a Pearl Earring.

Hail's obsession with an artist of Julian's time ties in with the plot... I don't know. The climax of this book didn't quite hit me like that in A College of Magics.

Profile

oyceter: teruterubouzu default icon (Default)
Oyceter

March 2021

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910 111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags