Alias 3x16 Taken
Sun, Mar. 21st, 2004 10:22 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
oyceterRead with caution (i.e. I have unpopular opinions re: a ton of stuff in Alias)
ETA: Spoilers for future episodes in the comments...
Wow. Barnett is very stupid. "I thought you had changed!" Dude. It's evil Uncle Arvin.
However, I am quite pleased that we seem to have returned to the Alias of old, in which they had spy missions and double-crossing and Rambaldi, as opposed to the Sydney and Vaughn furrowed brows and the Love of Doom! And smart Jack!
Although now I feel bad for Lauren and I'm scared they're going to kill her now. Sigh. I want my girl still there!
I was also pleased about the focus on Dixon, because I like him and I think he's interesting. But I do have a bit of a problem with Sydney's whole tactic of negotiate with the terrorists and how they sort of painted Senator Reed as being wrong about his thing. I don't know. I've never had a satisfactory answer to this, because whenever the heroes of shows do this (Buffy, etc), I want to argue about risking the greater good. But then, when they make decisions like Angel and Wes re: the individual, that is also problematic. I do, however, appreciate shows that wrestle with the issue instead of just outright going, Screw the greater good! Get the kids back!
On the promo: *gag* Stupid Vaughn. Sorry. I have gone all out with the bashing in my head, mostly about his wishy-washiness and his apparent inability to stay faithful to a single woman, be it Alice or Sydney or Lauren! Ugh. It's kind of like: Oh Alice, I love you! But I also lust after my coworker Sydney. Oh, but I cannot have Sydney, so I'll date you again, Alice! Oh wait, Sydney's available, I'm going to kiss her in the rubble and promptly dump you!
Then: "Oh Sydney, I love you! But you've been dead for six months. Oh Lauren, I love you and let's get married even though I'm still (probably) mourning my old girlfriend!"
Now: "Oh Lauren, I love you! But my old girlfriend is back from the dead, and I send her longing gazes. Oh, but we've already been married two whole years and I can't possibly commit for that long, so I'll just kiss Sydney. Now we aren't working out, sorry, too bad, let's break up."
My first reaction: "Kill Vaughn!"
You know, I feel kind of bad that I'm so negative, but it just annoys me so much!
ETA: Spoilers for future episodes in the comments...
Wow. Barnett is very stupid. "I thought you had changed!" Dude. It's evil Uncle Arvin.
However, I am quite pleased that we seem to have returned to the Alias of old, in which they had spy missions and double-crossing and Rambaldi, as opposed to the Sydney and Vaughn furrowed brows and the Love of Doom! And smart Jack!
Although now I feel bad for Lauren and I'm scared they're going to kill her now. Sigh. I want my girl still there!
I was also pleased about the focus on Dixon, because I like him and I think he's interesting. But I do have a bit of a problem with Sydney's whole tactic of negotiate with the terrorists and how they sort of painted Senator Reed as being wrong about his thing. I don't know. I've never had a satisfactory answer to this, because whenever the heroes of shows do this (Buffy, etc), I want to argue about risking the greater good. But then, when they make decisions like Angel and Wes re: the individual, that is also problematic. I do, however, appreciate shows that wrestle with the issue instead of just outright going, Screw the greater good! Get the kids back!
On the promo: *gag* Stupid Vaughn. Sorry. I have gone all out with the bashing in my head, mostly about his wishy-washiness and his apparent inability to stay faithful to a single woman, be it Alice or Sydney or Lauren! Ugh. It's kind of like: Oh Alice, I love you! But I also lust after my coworker Sydney. Oh, but I cannot have Sydney, so I'll date you again, Alice! Oh wait, Sydney's available, I'm going to kiss her in the rubble and promptly dump you!
Then: "Oh Sydney, I love you! But you've been dead for six months. Oh Lauren, I love you and let's get married even though I'm still (probably) mourning my old girlfriend!"
Now: "Oh Lauren, I love you! But my old girlfriend is back from the dead, and I send her longing gazes. Oh, but we've already been married two whole years and I can't possibly commit for that long, so I'll just kiss Sydney. Now we aren't working out, sorry, too bad, let's break up."
My first reaction: "Kill Vaughn!"
You know, I feel kind of bad that I'm so negative, but it just annoys me so much!
Re: spoilers spoilers spoilers
Sun, Mar. 21st, 2004 11:46 pm (UTC)Sigh. Well, at least it's not a Sydney's pregnant with Rambaldi spawn plot, which is what I've been secretly dreading. Because really? Ew!
I so want Lauren and Sark to get away with it. I loved that moment in this episode when Sark neutralized Jack's attempt to shoot him. Had the line from Spaceballs running through my head: "Now you see that Evil will always triumph.. because Good is dumb!"
Nyargh. All I want is consistent Lauren characterization -- no squishing her character to fit the really annoying S/V twu wuv of doom. And I loved her reversion to earlier this season Lauren, because I was fascinated with Lauren even before she was evil. I thought she had a sort of Dixon quality to her -- very go by the rules but because she believed in them, not because she was stupid. And when she broke the rules, she really had to wrestle with her conscience.
But then she turned evil, and exploring that got lost =(.