oyceter: Stack of books with text "mmm... books!" (mmm books)
[personal profile] oyceter
Ehm, yes, this is the first time I've read this...

Anyhow! I actually knew all of the plot, having read Jenna Starborn (Sharon Shinn's sci-fi take on the tale) and The Eyre Affair. Mostly I was afraid that I would detest Mr. Rochester and thereby not respect Jane, largely because I completely failed to understand the attraction in either of the two books mentioned above. [livejournal.com profile] rachelmanija had also told me not to worry too much, because the book is more about Jane than the romance.

I really liked Jane. I wasn't expecting to, largely because the many romance takes on the story of poor governess meets rich employer, falls in love and is lifted out of poverty have left me cold. But I liked Jane's determination and her morals, I liked that she was never willing to compromise what she felt was right, even in the face of adversity.

In a romance (I shall compare this to romances, since this is probably the only gothic I've ever read), this would be termed "spunk" or "spirit" and make me roll my eyes and want to whack the heroine over the head. But Bronte characterizes Jane so that she isn't so much high-spirited as stubborn, and there's an underlying strength of character, even when she's head over heels in love with Mr. Rochester. I also like that Jane's aunt doesn't end up forgiving her, I like that Adele isn't a charming, adorable child who brings Jane and Rochester together, I like that Mr. Rochester's attempts to prettify Jane and give her expensive things is unambiguously disliked by both Jane and the narrator.

It's actually rather amusing seeing how many romance cliches Bronte subverts, even though she was writing a good many, many years before the contemporary romance industry was formed.

I still dislike Mr. Rochester, though not as vehemently as I expected to. At some points, I was even persuaded to like him by Jane! I forgave him for the incessant questioning of Jane in the beginning (I personally abhor being talked to like that, so he rubbed me the wrong way to start with) and grew to like him until he proposed to Jane. Then he drove me batty by continually attempting to remake Jane and force things on her that she obviously didn't want. Also, I seem to be completely not in tune with his angst, because the Big Revelation did not spark any sympathy at all toward his previously rakish behavior. But I fondly dislike him, if that makes sense.

And although Bronte and Austen are polar opposites in terms of romance and the level of emotion expressed, the characterization of the Reeds and the Ingrams reminded me of Austen.

I'm glad that the book was in first person POV and that it was so Jane-centric (I feel stupid saying that, given the book's title), but I was a little afraid that it would be extreme moodiness and angst and woe. But it really isn't. The elements are there, but at the core is Jane herself, sturdy, stubborn, small, plain, and in possession of herself.

(no subject)

Thu, Feb. 2nd, 2006 03:05 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] fresne.livejournal.com
Yes, subverts, creates, codifies, transforms.

I sometimes think that many of the the sappier Romances in the same vein become sappy because they don't grasp Jane's essential core of steel and turn it into spunkyness instead.

I love her line, "Do you think because I am plain and little that I soleless and heartness. I have just as much sole as you and full as much heart." or something like that. It often meanders in my head and perhaps may mutate.

But that whole sequence when she is wandering and she sees the moon. There is that wonderfully gothic sense of the sublime.

I had a college class where we discussed Jane Eyre and Sense and Sensibility as grandparents, in their way, of the modern romance genre. I think I was the only person in the class, who would admit, to reading romance novels. I forget what romance we read. I remember thinking it wasn't the best choice.

Although, returning to Jane Eyre, I also quite like the line, "Is this my pale little elf, if this my mustard seed." because I quite like Rochester as well. He's a jerk, but in an incredibly vibrant way. Since this is a gothic novel, the novel is resplendant with the Other. He Other to her. The madwoman in the attic the darker/burning brightly/red room self.

Profile

oyceter: teruterubouzu default icon (Default)
Oyceter

March 2021

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910 111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags