oyceter: Stack of books with text "mmm... books!" (mmm books)
The Cinderella Deal (1996) - Linc Blaise is trying get a position at a local college, but for reasons that make sense nowhere but in romance-novel land, the people hiring expect him to be engaged. So he makes an offer to his disorganized, down-on-cash neighbor Daisy. Naturally, despite being complete opposites, attraction, lust, etc. I will say upfront that normally I hate the free-spirited, somewhat hippie women so prevalent in contemporary romance novels. I always feel like shaking them and saying, "Sometimes predictability is not a bad thing! As is not having mold on your dishes!"

This is, of course, utterly hypocritical, since I'm pretty sure I am that person to a lot of other people. (Okay, no mold. But no matter how neat I am, there are always piles of things, and I will never be Linc Blaise or anything remotely like him.)

Still, Crusie always manages to make me like her people, and this is no exception. I especially like watching Linc and Daisy compromise, and despite the romantic-comedy-ness of the set up, the two wanting each other and being convinced it's a terrible idea was very convincing.

Maybe not one of Crusie's best, but definitely one I enjoyed a lot.

Maybe This Time (2010) - When Andie Miller goes in to ask her ex-husband North Archer to stop sending alimony checks (she wants closure and they're a reminder), he says yes, but asks her to watch over his two wards, who are living in what may or may not be a haunted house.

This is the first Crusie I've read that I've not classified as a romance (I've never read her collaborations with Bob Mayer). The story is really more a mystery: is the house haunted? Why? What to do? And how to get the kids out of there?

Although I liked Andie with the two kids, who amazingly do not make me want to vomit with their overbearing cuteness, the ghost story wasn't great, particularly as more and more characters start to come in. I felt like, as in, Tell Me Lies, Crusie was sometimes tackling a subject too dark for her trademark humor, especially since everything ends up happily ever after. I was particularly unhappy with the characterization of the female reporter. Overall, I felt it suffered a bit from not being a romance, because I found the end conclusion with North coming in and the two falling back in love to be a bit too rushed.

Still funny, but it felt very unbalanced to me.
oyceter: teruterubouzu default icon (Calvin and Hobbes comics)
Allie McGuffey has been dumped by her boyfriend, who also happens to be the radio personality she helped make into a star. Enter Charlie Tenniel, who is in the radio business only as a favor to his father, a bad pickup line at a bar, and really good sex, and voila!

I, er, don't actually remember too much of this book, and I'm not sure if it's because I've read too many Crusies and this one doesn't particularly stand out, or because I read it while feeling desperately homesick and missing my sister, as well as being extremely short on sleep. I actually skimmed thorugh all the sex sections because I was too tired to read them. From what I remember, it's not bad sex writing (as opposed to bad sex, which it also isn't, but which can also be extremely amusing to read), and there were some bits on the heroine liking the top and enjoying the control that stood out.

I felt like Crusie could have lightened up a bit on the battle of the sexes on the air section, but luckily even then she doesn't hammer the point too hard.

Other than that, I'm not quite sure what to say. It's Jennifer Crusie, and as such, it is worth reading. I didn't like it as much as I've liked some of her other books, but then again, Crusie is in a class by herself in the romance genre.
oyceter: Stack of books with text "mmm... books!" (mmm books)
More Crusie!

Speaking of which, I had Krispy Kreme donuts for the first time, and in Ohio, in honor of Bet Me. I know, I'm a complete geek. Unfortunately, I have decided I am really just not a donut person. And is it spelled donut or doughnut or what?!

Manhunting: Uptight Kate vows to get a husband and as a result goes to the Cabin, a rich resort half run by laid back Jake. We can all see what's coming up from miles ahead, of course, being a romance, but that in no way detracts from the sheer enjoyment of watching Kate go through potential dates in a particularly lethal manner, or having the two be the last people to realize they are emitting giant sexual tension.

What the Lady Wants: Mae Sullivan walks through private investigator Mitch's door and fulfills all his dreams of being Sam Spade. Except she's not really Brigid O'Shaughnessy, and he's not very Sam Spade at all, and she's got an incredibly hilarious, over-protective family. I particularly adore Uncle Gio.

Links:
- [livejournal.com profile] minnow1212's review

I don't know why Crusie makes me so happy because I can never quite pin it down, but she's got impeccable comic timing, real people, and is immensely feminist in a non-angry, non-overly-PC type way. Okay, obviously these are things that make me happy.

Mmmm, need more Crusie....
oyceter: Stack of books with text "mmm... books!" (mmm books)
And I have just started glomming Jennifer Crusie again! (just sneaked to Borders to get another book... they only had Manhunting, was looking for Cinderella Deal. Oh well, will take anything).

This feels like an earlier book (probably since it is). It's funny, because I can get glimpses of Crazy for You in this book, especially in the Lucy-Bradley/Quinn-Bill relationship. Lucy, recently divorced, manages to get her life in danger thanks to some sort of mixed up scheme involving her ex, Bradley. Luckily, Zack the policeman is there to save the day. He ends up in her house as protection and learns how to cook (and enjoy it) and in general gets a bit domesticated.

It's got some very Crusie themes -- getting what you need, not what you think you need, and having Zack give Lucy the perfect present (ala Calvin and Min in Bet Me).

I'm rather fond of Lucy, particularly her blinking habit, because I suspect I do something like that too.

A particular favorite bit is Zack's proposal.

Romance books are hard to review, because so much of it depends on the characters instead of a clever plot or good world-building.

Anyway, warm, fuzzy, plus a really bad dye job, crazy exes, bombs, and three dogs.

Links:
- [livejournal.com profile] rachelmanija's review
oyceter: Stack of books with text "mmm... books!" (mmm books)
I thoroughly blame Jennifer Crusie for my three short hours of sleep last night ;).

Unfortunately, that led to an awful day at work -- pissed off, tired, just seeing the stacks of books to shelve made me walk to the bathroom so I could kick the wall in sheer frustration. Then I fell off the freaking ladder, at which point all I wanted to do was sit on the floor, cry, and chuck books at people.

Back to the book... fun, frothy, and highly enjoyable.

I love how Crusie writes about completely un-gorgeous characters and then makes them gorgeous. Min's overweight, and not in that slightly chubby way that feels like the writer is cheating. In Calvin's point of view, she's just lush -- a woman who should eat butter instead of going on Atkins diets.

ETA: I just realized Atkins is ok with butter. Or something. Oh well.

Bet Me's a little less serious than her later stuff has been, but it's just so enjoyable. I thought the emphasis on fairy tales was maybe just a little bit overdone, but in the end, didn't mind at all. Plus, I like how Min worries about happily ever after, because that was always my question as a kid.

And how could I not like Min? She eats! And not just eats, she eats like me! I was drooling through most of the book, and I don't even like chicken marsala or doughnuts (then again, never had Krispy Kreme). I just loved how she loved food, because food makes me happy in a sort of elemental way that very few things do. And she wears the shoes I would wear if 1) I had nice feet and 2) I never had to walk, ever.

I liked her friends, especially Bonnie and Roger and just how they knew, which was a nice contrast to Liza and Tony, who didn't get perfectly matched up, which would have been too cute. And I liked how the inlaws thing never quite worked out.

Lots of fun. Just thinking about it puts me in a better mood.

Links:
- [livejournal.com profile] coffeeandink's review
- [livejournal.com profile] rilina's review
- [livejournal.com profile] rachelmanija's review
- [livejournal.com profile] sophia_helix's review
oyceter: Stack of books with text "mmm... books!" (mmm books)
Older woman romance! Not only, but older woman and man ten years younger than her. I'd probably rec this book because of that factor alone, but luckily, it's also a pretty good book.

However, I didn't like it quite as much as the other Crusie's. While I did enjoy the fact that Nina was forty, recently divorced, inspired interest and was interested by a thirty year old guy, the book got a little repetitive at times dealing with that issue, which is pretty remarkable, considering how short the book is! It's one of Crusie's older category romances, this one for the Harlequin Love & Laughter title. The good is that it's funny and the atypical heroine and hero, both of whom I like. The bad is how Nina simply cannot get her mind around dating/having sex with a guy ten years younger than her. I appreciate that this is something she is concerned about, but I guess what got to me was that she kept using the exact same reason every time. She sounded a bit like a taped recording after a while. And there was a rather odd plot twist in the end concerning Alex doing something incredibly stupid for money.

So, good in general, but not really Crusie's best effort, IMHO.

ETA: I forgot to mention great dialogue, and some very funny moments. Best advice to guys: "Never wear Daffy Duck shorts to seduce a woman. You want her gasping in awe when she looks down there, not wondering how old you are." It also continues the tradition of making me really love her secondary characters, this case being Max, Alex's half-brother. Max is kind of washed out, not sure what he's doing with his life, but smart, and I kind of wanted him to get his own happy ever after.
oyceter: Stack of books with text "mmm... books!" (mmm books)
Mmm, I liked this one too, although maybe not as much as the Dempsey ones. I'm also highly appreciative of the fact that Nell and Suze are nothing like Quinn and Darla or Maddie and Treva or Tilda and her family. With Nora Roberts, I can kind of get a sense of mix and match -- fiery rebellious heroine, quiet sweet heroine, bookish heroine, with a few distinguishing traits, quiet hero, alpha hero who is still nice, slick, sophisticated hero. It's no where near as bad as Elizabeth Lowell, who basically just writes the same story again and again, but after reading a lot of her books, it shows. I also loved Nell and Suze. And Riley. I looooved Riley. Half the time with Crusie, I end up being more fascinated by the secondary couple than the first for some reason -- maybe because the first is very well-fleshed, so there's not that much mystery to them. I found the unprecedented moment [livejournal.com profile] naomichana commented on, in which there is a development in the relationship that I completely didn't anticipate, although thinking back, it was really pretty clear.

Instead of sad divorced woman trying to pick herself up again, which is what the story seems to be shaping up to be in the beginning, the story is a lot about relationship patterns and how we can ruin relationships ourselves. It's not very heavy handed, imho, and I especially enjoyed how even though Tim was pretty scummy and Jack was pretty freaky, all the fault on the failure of the relationship wasn't laid at their feet as bad, bad, evil men. I liked how both Nell and Suze were smart and confident enough to realize that although they definitely had had the short end of the stick in their marriages, part of it was because they let it happen. Now this sounds suspiciously close to blaming the victim, which I completely do not advocate, and I didn't get a sense of that at all in Crusie's book. I also enjoyed how Nell's son's romance in part echoed her own problems with Gabe (or Gabe's problems with her) and the general feeling that there wasn't going to be a happy ever after, because that would imply complacency. I liked knowing that both Nell and Gabe were on the track to actively thinking about the relationship and about themselves and how they wanted things to go instead of sitting back and saying, hey, we're in love, all is fixed!

More viscerally: Loved the scene with Nell in Tim's office. Loved her eating all the time (I want to try vinegar and fries now). Loved the Nell in the beginning, which felt like a plausible person who was still getting over a divorce, dealing with the sheer inexplicableness of it and later, dealing with the anger of being lied too for her own good. I get that (*cough*Vaughn issues*cough*).

I like how Crusie's romances are frothy and funny but still real and somehow chewy and rather common sensical on romance, something that can be lost in the genre. It reminds me a little of Kinsale's Prince of Midnight, which I love in part because it has the hero questioning what he thinks is love, what is love, how can one determine that one loves someone else?

Links:
- [livejournal.com profile] minnow1212's review
- [livejournal.com profile] tenemet's review
oyceter: Stack of books with text "mmm... books!" (mmm books)
I did a great deal of Jennifer Crusie reading this week and as such, am now feeling the urge to run to a bookstore to get Fast Women. She makes me happy.

The spree started with Faking It. I could tell it was a good book before I even started because of the dedication: "For Pat Gaffney: for her magnificent novels, limitless patience, and unconditional friendship, and because she totally gets the Buffy the Vampire Slayer thing." ;) I actually think I may have liked Fast Women better than Welcome to Temptation because I like Davy Dempsey so much... Phin Tucker's a wee bit on the alpha male side. Besides, I loved the sex scenes -- awkwardness, good sex, bad emotional connections, and plus, they sounded like actual people having sex instead of some sort of glorified romance novel sex. I also grew quite fond of the Goodnight family and of how Crusie is good at painting quirky characters without seeming like she's doing it by the numbers, giving them silly traits just to make them quirky. Does that make sense? Too often I feel like romance authors will just throw in some random trait (i.e. heroine disregards social conventions) while not really concentrating on how it would affect the heroine's life. Although sometimes, some things were a little on the "cute" side (muffins vs. doughnuts). Plus, I really liked Tilda, described as bug-eyed and strange, not at all gorgeous, or even pretty by anyone's standards, until Davy starts to fall for her. I also liked Eve and Louise, Gwen, and especially Nadine. I really want to see what Nadine is like when she grows up. And I liked Gwen's love life and the little umbrellas. The book is also absolutely insane, with hit men and forgeries and identity disorders, and yet, it all works out for me, with enough emotional weight so even while I laugh, I still like the characters. And I'm particularly fond of the sex scene where Davy and Tilda try to top each other with whose family is worse.

Then I went on to Crazy for You, a reread. I didn't like it as much the first time round, I think because I was more expecting a typical romance. Also, I can kind of see in this book how Crusie may have been moving from more standard romances to the more quirky ones she writes now. Quinn is just a little too sweet and pretty for me in the beginning, and I perpetually want to hit Nick over the head because he's really stupid. Really. I get annoyed when characters just sit around in romances and tell themselves how they can't get together with so-and-so because of such-and-such. This goes on for a great deal of the book. But I liked watching Quinn kind of explode out of her old life and how it influences everyone around her. I like that she's older, I like that she has a friend who's been married seventeen years and is bored, and I like that her mother does things too. People from all stages of life/romantic relationships getting around deciding to do something different, to take chances. In the end, I think my favorite storyline was Darla and Max, who've been married seventeen years when Darla realizes that it's boring. They don't do anything. It's all taken for granted by now. I've always liked the romances where the couple gets married in the beginning and then has to work things out, because I've always wanted to know what happens happily ever after (one thing that can annoy me about some fairy tales). Along other lines, Bill is really, really creepy. Ick.

Then I read Tell Me Lies, which I started a while before and never got around to finishing -- tone of this book is very different, much more serious, just as Crazy for You is a little bit more serious than Faking It. CL and Maddie don't actually stick in my mind that much, or Maddie's decision to go for him. What really does is Em and her mother and grief, as well as Maddie's role in the town, how she thinks of herself, buried secrets and hurts, etc. I think I'm going to have to reread it again at some point so that there's a more coherent plotline in my head, as opposed to fifteen pages every other day, forget I was reading the book for a few months, hundred pages to the end in one night. It's still kind of resonating with me, which is always good.

Apparently there's going to be a new book by her soon too! Described as cheesily romantic... can't wait ^_^. It's hard finding romance authors I like without qualms, and so far the three books of Crusie's that I've read are all pretty good -- most authors are a little bit more up and down with me. I also love that her characters feel like actual people, not the slightly glossified people of most contemporaries.

Links:
- [livejournal.com profile] tenemet's review of Crazy for You
- [livejournal.com profile] tenemet's review of Faking It
oyceter: teruterubouzu default icon (book addict)
Potential spoilers for Welcome to Temptation, First Lady, Angels and Demons, and Wrapt in Crystal ahead.

Picked up Jennifer Crusie's Welcome to Temptation last week and loved it. Sounds stupid, but I was actually laughing so hard I had to put the book down sometimes. Plus, tiny Buffy reference in there! Pluses include a heroine willing to explore her own sexual kinks, a great hero with a kid who wasn't too sappily cute, and tons of characters who were just weird and odd enough to make me think of them as people, not the overly cute, look how charmingly quirky I am characters that often people romances.

Also got Susan Elizabeth Phillip's First Lady, which I also liked. Unfortunately, I read it after the Crusie, and it suffered in comparison. I like the trend of older heroines in contemporary romances. I like having heroines with a past, who have gone through life and heartbreak and experience, not the virignal, sex-shy heroines in a lot of the historicals whose pasts generally seem to just give them neuroses about having sex. I did think Nealy was a little too cute sometimes, and the Angel of Baby Death bit felt a little forced, as though Phillips had to saddle her heroine with an irrational phobia to be conquered. Lucy and Button were a little too cute and easily handled as well, especially the easy melting away of Lucy's supposedly streetwise and punk exterior.

The boy has been telling me to read Dan Brown's Angels and Demons and The Da Vinci Code for quite some time now, and I finally picked up the first one. I liked the references to Rome and the puzzles, like the boy thought I would, but several things really really annoyed me. First was the author's rather heavy handed pushing together of the lead male and female characters. Every so often, with no characterization at all, he would narrate, she was very worried about the guy! The guy is now quite attracted to her! And I'm just sitting there, thinking, uh huh. Then there was the stereotype of the Middle Eastern assassin (or Hassassin) and his desire/hate for women, which I felt was rather gratuitous and was put in only so the female character could be kidnapped and almost raped. Yick. Then there were the rather gruesome descriptions of how everyone was killed. This may just be my squeamish point, but I really hate this kind of find the serial killer book. Especially when everyone ends up dead. I was a little more ok with Silence of the Lambs because the author had the killings happen in the past, and in the end the girl was saved. I think I'm a sap at heart. But also, gruesome descriptions really gross me out. I don't like random violence or these books or movies (like Bone Collector) that seem to have fun thinking of the most bizarre and disgusting way to kill people. I also had a problem with the author's eventual depiction of the Church. Giant spoilers for the end here )

So from that book and Sharon Shinn's Wrapt in Crystal, thinking a little more about religion and faith (again). I very much enjoy Shinn's books -- she blends romance, religion/faith, and scifi/fantasy in a very readable mix. And in this book I don't feel like she's bashing me over the head, like she can get sometimes about the Edori and the Edori lifestyle in the Samaria books. Basically Wrapt in Crystal is a detective story, in which a man who has lost his faith is sent to a planet to investigate killings of nuns/ordained women of two sects who worship the same goddess. I thought Shinn did a pretty good job in presenting the two facets of the worship of Ava, the goddess -- the Triumphantes worship in joy and the Fideles in suffering (more secular vs. ascetic I guess). Found some interesting bits on how an austere religion/practice may in some ways be easier than the secular one, ideas of how to give one's life over completely to a higher power, how joy and the like are not always evil or worldly things. Even though I'm not religious, I find books that explore the topic of faith and of higher powers and belief very interesting. So I rather enjoyed this book.

Profile

oyceter: teruterubouzu default icon (Default)
Oyceter

March 2021

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910 111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags