oyceter: teruterubouzu default icon (Default)
[personal profile] oyceter
In late Victorian and early Edwardian England, stage magicians Alfred Borden and Rupert Angier form a rivalry with each other that eventually affects not only them, but also their descendents.

Plot summaries for this book aren't particularly satisfying, as the bulk of the book is in its structure. We begin with the descendents finding out more about their magician ancestors via diaries, and Alfred Borden's begins by telling you he is performaing a magic trick with his very narrative. Angier's diaries, not written for potential publication, don't have quite the same sense of illusion and mystery about them until the final bits.

I read this after I had seen the movie, so I already knew the major revelations. While I liked the additional details in the book, particularly about stagecraft and magic, the movie version of the characters and motivations resonated more with me. As such, I'm not sure how much of my dissatisfaction from the book stems from the book itself, and how much stems from comparison to the movie.

I was particularly irritated by the framing device of the descendents, given how Priest developed it. Due to mentions of the Borden-Angier feud lasting for generations, I wanted to see more of how both men affected their families. Instead, the bulk of the novel is still about Borden and Angier's personal lives, so much so that the single feud-like event from later on read as completely random to me. There is no sense of why the feud extends beyond Borden and Angier, save the fact that Priest needs to wrap up his story thematically.

The other bit that bothered me was how pointless the feud felt. Obviously, I know it should feel pointless to anyone but the two men involved, but the sense of urgency and obsession and rising stakes from the movie is completely missing. Instead, my impression was that either man could have walked away at any time, not out of better judgment, but out of simple ennui, which doesn't seem to be the best end to a multi-generation feud. I'm fine with the feud itself feeling petty and stupid, but it seemed that both Borden and Angier thought so as well at quite a few points in the narrative, which made me just want to shake them and ask them why they kept it going outside of "needed to further the plot." I was also intrigued by the bits of internal conflict hinted at in Borden's narrative, and I actually think I would have rather read a book about that than about the Borden-Angier conflict.

Finally, I have no idea what happened in the last two pages or so.

Spoilers for book AND movie

So has Angier just been lurking around the mansion basement for several decades? What did he do? Did the rest of the family know? For a bit, I thought he might have continually staged himself as the Earl of Coldenham 14, 15, 16, etc. by conveniently dying off every so often, since that was the only explanation I could think of for Kate's father throwing Nicky into the machine. Otherwise, that level of hatred and maliciousness felt extremely out of place. We get very little about the generations in between to explain why Clive Borden may have wanted to apologize, or why Kate's father would be angry about it. Is it the Bordens' desire to figure out the trick?

The final reveal of the vault of "prestige materials" was appropriately creepy, as was the roundabout way Angier talked about the prestige materials and his plans for them. I guess my main issue is that I never felt that Angier was sufficiently motivated to go to such lengths for a magic trick. We get a little about Julia pushing him back into the world of magic, as well as his desire to figure out what makes The New Transported Man work, but the bulk of his diary read to me as though magic were something he could put down and not think about, which doesn't fit the amount of energy and money he pours into the Tesla machine. Whereas the movie has Angier pushing Olivia away to spy on Borden, the book making the spying Olivia's idea lessens the impact of Angier's desire to know Borden's tricks.

Borden, on the other hand, I would believe that of. The overarching reach of the Pact, the disagreement between the Bordens, the conflict between life with Sarah and life with Olivia... all that I found much more fascinating. It also felt as though one twin was more pulled toward a non-magic life, as opposed to the other, who found the trick of the prestige of the highest importance and not trivial at all, and that's the conflict I was most interested in.

I was also expecting more about the thread of twins in the Borden line, given Andrew's intial narration, Borden's own lives, and the fact that his children with Sarah are twins.

Overall, Priest's puzzle box is intriguing and satisfying as a puzzle, but it didn't work that well for me as a story, at least in comparison with the movie. I probably would have been much more impressed had I read it first.

I am going to assume that there are spoilers for both book AND movie in the comments, since it's pretty difficult to discuss either without spoilers.

Links (assume spoilers!):
- [personal profile] coffeeandink on book and film
- Gary Westfahl's review of the film, with comparisons to the book, most of which I disagree with
- [livejournal.com profile] instant_fanzine discussion of the book
- [livejournal.com profile] kate_nepveu's thoughts

Any other links? I think I read them when the movie came out in 2006 (it was that long ago?!), but it'd be interesting to reread now that I've read the novel.

(no subject)

Tue, Jan. 31st, 2012 02:02 am (UTC)
veejane: Pleiades (Default)
Posted by [personal profile] veejane
I read the book after the movie as well, and though I think I can separate them in my mind, the book suffers in comparison. (I think I revewed both, probably a year apart, but memfault any links.) Mostly I recall its suffering in pacing, and in the thematics coming round to the end: something about the twinned Angiers not being solid, whole people just didn't work for me. I think because I too found Alfred by far the most interesting element, how they worked together, even when it got contentious. Their intimacy showed the success of twinning, and to see book-Angier make such a pale (literally) rehearsal of it felt more monstrous, even, than movie-Angier's behavior.

Movie-Angier at least made a whole twin, and "risked" his own death every time. (*) It was insane, and relied on murder, and he obviously didn't love and couldn't work with each successive twin (didn't even try), but that was the point: that he could have what Alfred had; it was right in front of him; and he just couldn't stand to share the limelight. He was a bad magician.

(* And I like and empathize with the body-horror of discovering your doppelganger, even an expected one, and attacking him as an imposter. That funhouse mirror revulsion is a trope I find fqascinating.)

(no subject)

Tue, Jan. 31st, 2012 04:27 am (UTC)
rachelmanija: (Books: old)
Posted by [personal profile] rachelmanija
I never understood the ending either, but have now forgotten exactly what happened. If I recall correctly, Angier got interrupted by Borden halfway through teleporting/cloning, and so was dying. But mysteriously got better? (Why?)

And the narrator from the frame story believed he had a twin, because he'd fallen into the machine (how?) and his "prestige material" was still locked in the basement with all of Angier's "prestige materials." What were the prestige materials, anyway? Did they have awareness? Were they fully aware but paralyzed clones? Or something else? I was very confused by this.

And... uh... fucked-up Angier was still lurking around? Got me.

The book is indeed more impressive if you read it first. The movie has everything that's good about the book (the concept and some of the plot) and fixes its flaws by ditching the confusing frame story, giving more juice to the rivalry, making the "prestige materials" thing about a billion times creepier, and providing a third act that makes sense.

(no subject)

Tue, Jan. 31st, 2012 04:39 am (UTC)
metaphortunate: (Default)
Posted by [personal profile] metaphortunate
Fascinating: sounds like one of the rare movie adaptations that's better than the original book.

(no subject)

Tue, Jan. 31st, 2012 07:20 am (UTC)
lovepeaceohana: A tilted artist's rendition of a clear blue ocean with sky and clouds above; text reads "now bring me that horizon..." (Default)
Posted by [personal profile] lovepeaceohana
Huh. I remember having seen this movie, and loved it inasmuch as I can love anything whose ending creeps me right the fuck out - I hadn't realized there was a book! But reading this makes me kind of think I shouldn't, because I am also not such a huge fan of "feuding cause it's the done thing" trope.

Although, I am intrigued, because I'm not following what's happening at the very end. It seems to be very different from the film because of different characters? What's this about the kid (Nicky?) thrown into the clone-making machine? *soooo confused*

(no subject)

Tue, Jan. 31st, 2012 10:08 pm (UTC)
lovepeaceohana: A tilted artist's rendition of a clear blue ocean with sky and clouds above; text reads "now bring me that horizon..." (Default)
Posted by [personal profile] lovepeaceohana
I guess it makes as much sense to me as it does to you. I'm not getting the adoption thing either :\ He sees the clone, but then still gives his kid up for adoption anyway? Maybe he's trying to help the kid escape the family feud? When you first mentioned it I had thought that maybe the kid's dad only saw the dead-ish clone, and didn't realize the kid was still alive, and then the other guy gave the kid up for adoption.

And, whoa yeah, that's way more petty of a feud. ffs.

Thanks for explaining it, though. I'll have to watch the movie again - all this discussion is fascinating, but my memory has so many holes that I feel like I'm missing half the understandings and aha moments ^^;

(no subject)

Tue, Jan. 31st, 2012 06:33 pm (UTC)
ranalore: (anyband bora resistance)
Posted by [personal profile] ranalore
I haven't read the book, in large part because both the press and the author's self-promotion when it came out was so very, "Oh, it's so clever!" Long experience has taught me that narratives lauded as such generally aren't, and are often so smug they tap dance on my nerves. In fact, the only reason I saw the movie was the lure of cinema!Tesla (and then to see David Bowie in the role was just so perfect I actually cried), and while I liked it, I figured out the "twist" pretty early, so the mystery certainly would never have been a draw for me. I also knew two hours was all the time I was willing to spend in Borden and Angier's company, so a whole book of them? No thanks.

(no subject)

Wed, Feb. 1st, 2012 03:57 am (UTC)
spilledink: (Default)
Posted by [personal profile] spilledink
I burned through The Prestige when I read it a few years ago; I couldn't put the thing down. And now I don't remember most of it! That just goes to show that gripping-ness is not necessarily an indicator of memorability.

I read The Glamour recently and liked it a lot. Again with the not being able to remember much beside the central gimmick, though. Priest seems to be like that, clever but ultimately cold.


oyceter: teruterubouzu default icon (Default)

October 2017


Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags