(no subject)
Wed, Apr. 7th, 2004 02:39 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
oyceterBrought on by Time Magazine and I guess CNN and the other news sites which ran giant stories about the four Americans killed in Iraq...
Keep in mind that I am in general very iffy and fence-sitting on the entire issue of the US as a sort of global police force. Part of me thinks it's horrible that no one stepped in and stopped what happened in Rwanda ten years ago and part of me think things like what's happening in Iraq is a sort of response or effect of the US as police force.
And I totally get that it's awful four people were killed there, especially with the unsureness as to why they were there at all.
But I also feel kind of disturbed that the deaths of one or two or four Americans makes the front pages everywhere and generates giant articles in Time so much so that the news-phobic me knows about it, while I don't know things like how many Iraqis did we kill there?
If the names of the four people who were killed there are going to be big national news, along with their families' reactions, what about the people whose homes were invaded, who had to live with these other people in their country? I would like to know their stories. And maybe I don't because in general I'm absolutely awful at keeping up with news and politics, which is why I generally try not to make controversial political posts -- I really don't know what I'm talking about over half of the time.
It's the entire ethnic studies problem, in a way -- how to know what's "authentic," which experience is generalized or filtered through a certain ideology?
But yeah, I would like to know what people there think of us being there and of the deaths there of people of all nationalities, because I think it is a big deal that people are being killed down there -- being American does not make it more or less important.
Keep in mind that I am in general very iffy and fence-sitting on the entire issue of the US as a sort of global police force. Part of me thinks it's horrible that no one stepped in and stopped what happened in Rwanda ten years ago and part of me think things like what's happening in Iraq is a sort of response or effect of the US as police force.
And I totally get that it's awful four people were killed there, especially with the unsureness as to why they were there at all.
But I also feel kind of disturbed that the deaths of one or two or four Americans makes the front pages everywhere and generates giant articles in Time so much so that the news-phobic me knows about it, while I don't know things like how many Iraqis did we kill there?
If the names of the four people who were killed there are going to be big national news, along with their families' reactions, what about the people whose homes were invaded, who had to live with these other people in their country? I would like to know their stories. And maybe I don't because in general I'm absolutely awful at keeping up with news and politics, which is why I generally try not to make controversial political posts -- I really don't know what I'm talking about over half of the time.
It's the entire ethnic studies problem, in a way -- how to know what's "authentic," which experience is generalized or filtered through a certain ideology?
But yeah, I would like to know what people there think of us being there and of the deaths there of people of all nationalities, because I think it is a big deal that people are being killed down there -- being American does not make it more or less important.
(no subject)
Wed, Apr. 7th, 2004 07:16 pm (UTC)But this upset me, too, so I went looking for body counts a few weeks ago. These are hard to find, since -- among other reasons -- Rumsfeld announced the U.S. was going to stop tracking Iraqi deaths early in the war. Iraq Body Count (http://www.iraqbodycount.org) claims over 10,000 Iraqis have been killed. I'm not sure this is credible, though of course that may be wishful thinking on my part. I'm having a hard time finding other sources. Human Rights Watch (http://www.humanrightswatch.org) lists 94 verified civilian deaths (http://www.hrw.org/press/2003/10/iraq102103.htm) in Baghdad between May 1 and September 30, but also says hundreds of civilian deaths (http://www.hrw.org/press/2003/12/us-iraq-press.htm) due to land mines were preventable, and says "more than a thousand people" were "killed or wounded." These are body counts for very specific times or causes, and I think much lower than the totals.
From looking at various sources, I get 3-5,000 Iraqi "soldiers" (not sure how this is being defined) and 2-3,000 civilians. But that could be far too low.
(no subject)
Fri, Apr. 9th, 2004 09:48 pm (UTC)Thanks for the links -- I've been trolling around Human Rights Watch.
Sometimes I feel like it is a moral obligation to get my head out of the sand every so often, sad as that may sound.