Race and Pirates

Sat, Jul. 8th, 2006 11:54 am
oyceter: teruterubouzu default icon (Default)
[personal profile] oyceter
I ended up buying Beverly Tatum's "Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?", despite already having borrowed it from the library because a) I wanted something to read in line while I waited to get a seat for Pirates of the Caribbean 2 and b) I want to financially support books like these and authors who tackle the subject of race.

I read a few chapters while standing in line, delighted by Tatum's definitions and her clear explanations and her compassion toward people of color and Whites alike.

Then I went in to watch Pirates.

And I watched, and I grew more and more uncomfortable. Jack Sparrow and crew run amok of cannibals. The cannibals, are, of course, Black. They have face paint and random piercings; they have made Jack Sparrow their king. He speaks to them in terms like, "Licka licka, savvy?" There are a few people of color in his pirate crew, but their speaking parts are small, and they all have very strong accents. Or they don't speak at all and lend their faces to the motley look of the crew. The main character of color is a Black woman, a voodoo witch or something, with eyeballs in jars, blackened teeth, and an accent so strong that I couldn't understand her half the time.

While I was noticing this and noticing the fact that there were no non-stereotyped portrayals of people of color, I was growing more and more uncomfortable with this awareness. I'm actually very ashamed to say this, but I kept thinking of things like, "Oh, is it really that bad?" and "It's just a movie" and "Really, it's about pirates, what can you expect?" and "It's all in good fun."

Except... it isn't.

And I can't get over the fact that even though I had been reading about race right before the movie, noticing the stereotypes and being critical of race in the movie made me incredibly uncomfortable and squirmy, so much so that I tried to rationalize it away. I spent the first half of the movie squirming and becoming more and more aware of the fact that my mind kept trying to slip away from the topic of race, kept trying to not confront it and come up with more and more reasons why it really wasn't that bad.

Except... it is that bad.

It is bad that I cannot think about race without this extreme uncomfortableness, that I cannot do it without attempting to rationalize and excuse, that I cannot do it even after reading about it and being fully committed to speaking out. And it is even worse, because I know if I had seen the movie without having read the Tatum beforehand, I would have noticed, but I would have let myself brush it off, let myself not post about it.

I didn't even post about this last night because it made me so uncomfortable.

Well, also, I wanted to make myself a "Not the magical minority fairy" icon.

But anyway. No more excuses from me, no rationalization. The movie is incredibly racist. I still had some fun watching it, but knowing that it was racist and knowing that most of the audience very likely wouldn't think so spoiled the majority of it for me.

I have difficulties just typing "The movie is incredibly racist," and I have to keep thinking about how I routinely notice the portrayal of women in nearly everything I read and watch (the movie is not as deeply sexist as it is racist; thankfully, Elizabeth gets to do stuff. But it is still very male). I have to keep thinking that for me, noticing sexism is ok, that pointing it out in my LJ is standard. And I have to keep thinking that I need to do the same about race, even though posting things like this frighten me because of the reaction to the Great Cultural Appropriation Debate of DOOM.

Part of me doesn't even want to keep talking about this because it's so uncomfortable, because it causes such defensiveness in other people, because I am tired of being told that I am wrong for seeing these things. And that's the very reason I am making myself post this, making myself confront the nidginess and the squirminess, the problems that I have in just acknowledging that something that I am enjoying is racist.

ETA: Freezing some threads in which further discussion seems to be rather pointless.

ETA2: I'm now screening all anonymous comments to this entry, not because I don't welcome them, but because I've been getting stupid spam comments everyday. If you aren't a spambot, you should make it through the screening! This is for spam only, not opinion-filtering.

(no subject)

Sun, Jul. 9th, 2006 02:47 am (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] p-zeitgeist.livejournal.com
I'm here via [livejournal.com profile] bonibaru, and I can't resist jumping in to say that for many years -- long before the Jackson LOTR went into production -- I have thought that if I were casting a LOTR production, I'd handle the race thing by making the Elves, the Numenoreans, or the Rohirrim black. The only issue would be which to choose (you know: it would be very cool to have it be the Rohirrim, because then you'd have Black Anglo-Saxons, only then you're dealing with the fact that canonically, they're considered closer to the barbarian past than either of the other two; it would be fun to have it be the Elves, because they're canonically more beautiful than the children of men, but then you've got issues with exoticizing the Other; if you have it be the Numenoreans you start getting undesirable Othello-type resonances with Aragorn and Arwen). But really, I still think that any of the three would have worked, not only helping to defuse any implicit racism but also working to preserve a genuine point in the books. The idea of the different races is prominent there, and it virtually disappears on screen when you cast everybody as generic white guys.

I still resent the extension of copyright term that means nobody but Jackson's ever going to get to do a version of those books. Or at least, nobody but Jackson is in my lifetime.

(no subject)

Sun, Jul. 9th, 2006 05:08 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] rachelmanija.livejournal.com
I was going to say, there are sufficient differences between humans, hobbits, elves, dwarves, and hobbits to make it perfectly plausible that they wouldn't all have the same color skin, so that was basically where I was going too.

Actually, the Rohirrim I would want to keep white (and blonde) because they're so clearly based on the Anglo-Saxons that it would otherwise be jarring, and the hobbits are so clearly based on Ye Olde White England that I'd probably want to do the same with them. But I'd say that everyone else is up for grabs. Middle Earth may be England, but it's England with elves. Why is it so much less plausible that there would be non-evil dark-skinned characters than that there would be magical pointy-eared characters?

The orcs are supposed to be corrupted elves, so it would be faithful to the logic of the book to have elves and orcs be played by actors of the same race. Having white elves and black orcs is faithful to one aspect of the book, but not to another; and as those are the sort of choices a director must make at every step of the way, coming back to the original post, if you have The Island of Dark-Skinned Cannibals, it's because someone decided to put it in; the Dark-Skinned Cannibals did not just magically descend upon the movie with no intervention from (non-cannibal) human hands.

(no subject)

Mon, Jul. 10th, 2006 05:22 am (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] rachelmanija.livejournal.com
Yeah, I was thinking about that very point about hobbits, because your memory is correct: different... hmmm, families? ethnicities? of hobbits are supposed to look different and be culturally distinct-- note the extremely different naming conventions of the Tooks and the Brandybucks vs. everyone else. I tended to think of it as equivalent to English vs. Irish, but there is definitely a distinction, and one which the films (which I love in many ways, by the way) ignored completely.

If I did cast multiracially within the larger racial groups (elves, orcs, etc) I think I would divide it like that (all Brandybucks played by Hispanic actors, for instance) and make more of a point of intra-hobbit, etc, cultural differences.

Seriously, I don't see why that is any less plausible than having orcs played by Maori actors, or Elrond played by an actor who at the time was extremely associated with The Matrix's Agent Smith.

(no subject)

Mon, Jul. 10th, 2006 06:44 am (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] daegaer.livejournal.com
In fact the book!hobbits are not white, to the best of my recollection. As far as I can remember (it's been quite a while since I read the books) they are darker-skinned than the humans. Elves are hardly ever described, and when they are they seem to usually have dark hair (I don't think their skin tone is ever described, but the all-blond all-the-time Lothlorien of the films doesn't have a basis in the books). I think that orcs in the books come in a variety of skin tones too. The films flatten a lot of things in the books out to pretty whiteness (the same with the portrayal of women, of course. Giving Aragorn's critique of Rohirrim sexism to Grima makes it something that can be safely ignored, and that then weakens the fact that book!Eowyn would rather die than continue in the socially approved roles for Rohirrim women).

(no subject)

Thu, Jun. 7th, 2007 06:41 pm (UTC)
ext_3386: (Default)
Posted by [identity profile] vito-excalibur.livejournal.com
Yes, I know this comment is a year too late, but you just linked to it. :)

Ever since Fellowship I've wished that they'd had Zhang Ziyi play Arwen and Angela Bassett Galadriel. I don't care that Galadriel's supposed to be blond. If they can have Aragorn fall off a goddamn cliff, and that weird necklace thing that they TOTALLY STOLE from DRAGONLANCE, they could make Galadriel have gold or copper streaks or something.

Profile

oyceter: teruterubouzu default icon (Default)
Oyceter

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718 19202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Active Entries

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags