oyceter: Delirium from Sandman with caption "That and the burning baby fish swimming all round your head" (delirium)
[personal profile] oyceter
I just finished the new Harry Potter... managed to get my hands on it yesterday after someone took pity and lent it to me.

Wow, now I wish I had taken longer to read it. And I'm glad I didn't turn out to be spoiled... I accidently clicked on a cut tag one day and could have sworn it implied Snape was going to die. I amused the boy greatly about my wild speculations too. So when's the next one coming out?

I was greatly proud of my girl Hermione, and of Ron being prefect and winning the Quidditch Cup for Gryffindor. And I loved seeing more of Snape's past, and the greying of Harry's dad. Except... the last scene, at the train station, it suddenly occured to me that Lupin's the last of the gang really. And that made me sad.

Still want to see more of Harry's dad and mom and the history thereof. Am very excited about the second war starting. Surprisingly, I didn't think this book was that dark. I mean, they went through dark times, definitely, but they still felt like teenagers to me, worried about lots of things, like school and their love lives, and that made me happy. Actually, it's reminding me more and more of Buffy -- prophecies, seven years worth of series, the juxtaposition of the funny and light and the dark and scary.

Not many deep thoughts right now. Strangely, I found myself more scared and sad at the end of Goblet than in this one. I think because that was the first time Rowling killed off a semi-major character -- you knew that was going to change the series and that no one was really immune anymore. And the bringing back Voldemort scenes in that one were creepy as all hell. I finished that at two in the morning and didn't want to sleep for fear of seeing red eyes in a white face. The prophecy also didn't surprise me that much, I mean, who else in a series called "Harry Potter" would kill Voldemort?

Loved the DA, enjoyed hating Umbridge and the fear of totalitarian governments and the like and censorship and all those real life issues. I also liked the fact that Dumbledore didn't make Hermione look stupid for SPEW and the hints at a better, less racist wizarding world, because the constant laughing at house elves and at Hermione's quest to be nice to them really bugged me -- how could they yell at people for calling Hermione a mudblood and still say house elves were just born to be slaves?

Desperately waiting for the next one now!

Links:
- [livejournal.com profile] rilina's review
- my reread

Points of view

Sat, Jun. 28th, 2003 11:25 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] selenak.livejournal.com
This is one of the things I loved about OotP: where we have been told about the Harry/Tom Riddle parallels several times (notably in CoS and GoF), we haven't exactly been shown Harry could go either way. OotP makes it clear being good will always have to be a choice for Harry, not his inevitable destiny. He had the childhood from hell, four years of Evil Overlord pursuit, was alternatingly either celebrated or suspected, patronized and ridiculed by the wizard world which at first seemed to be so seductive an escape from the Muggle world, survived torture and saw a classmate killed in front of him. If he were still well-adjusted, it would be somewhat unnatural. (Though how many "children's books" are that realistic? Or series in general? Again, I have to point to TV and Buffy and Farscape as the only other examples I can think of.) He's not just being a teenager, he's one emotionally scarred kid, quite capable of lashing out at people, and while I always liked him, this book was the first where he became the most interesting character to me.

Harry as unreliable narrator: or at least Harry as extremely subjective narrator, a point made as early as Philospher's Stone, I believe, as Harry himself realizes he misinterpreted quite a lot of what he saw in regards to Snape (and Quirrel). Also, by letting Hermione be right quite often (notably in GoF and OotP) and using her to explain people's motives Rowlings emphasizes the subjectivity of Harry's perspective. (Think, for example, of Hermione correctly interpreting Sirius' behaviour long before Harry can bring himself to see Sirius as flawed.)

Umbridge as the banalty of evil: Oh yes. And definitely the most scary villain because of it. Evil Overlords and their minions carry an aura of pleasant unreality with them, but the Umbridges of this world, and the institutions behind them, are all too real.

HP: 1984

Mon, Jun. 30th, 2003 05:46 am (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] selenak.livejournal.com
...that would be a fascinating AU, indeed. And would lead to some interesting alliances, because, see Real Life, some people see "security" as an aim they are happy to trade their civil liberties in for. So Dumbledore or Harry & Co. would find it far harder to recruit allies for the resistance and might be forced to team up with some Dark Wizards.

Profile

oyceter: teruterubouzu default icon (Default)
Oyceter

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718 19202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Active Entries

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags