But also, I read theory because I like it and find it useful. I don't think the point of Wiscon to disempower people who aren't academics.
It is useful! Which is not to say that not knowing it disqualifies people. But I can't believe this is one of the first times in my life I have thought about race like this, seeing the consistent co-opting of a discussion of race going back to whiteness (not just on LJ, through college and high school as well) as a problem.
I can't believe it took me so long, and I am extremely ashamed of the fact that it did.
But a large part in getting here was feminist theory and substituting "minority" and "majority" in place of "female" and "male" and seeing that the patterns of discourse were alarmingly familiar.
Uh, not to say that they are the same. But it was very helpful, if that makes sense.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Thu, Jun. 1st, 2006 08:47 pm (UTC)But also, I read theory because I like it and find it useful. I don't think the point of Wiscon to disempower people who aren't academics.
It is useful! Which is not to say that not knowing it disqualifies people. But I can't believe this is one of the first times in my life I have thought about race like this, seeing the consistent co-opting of a discussion of race going back to whiteness (not just on LJ, through college and high school as well) as a problem.
I can't believe it took me so long, and I am extremely ashamed of the fact that it did.
But a large part in getting here was feminist theory and substituting "minority" and "majority" in place of "female" and "male" and seeing that the patterns of discourse were alarmingly familiar.
Uh, not to say that they are the same. But it was very helpful, if that makes sense.