![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I am not quite sure what to think of this book, particularly after I've read The Obsession. While I agree about things like not marketing fast food in school and making healthier foods more accessible to people with lower incomes, there are some arguments of the authors that bother me a little, except I can't quite figure out why.
The subtitle of the book pretty much summarizes what Critser is looking to convince the reader of, and in one of the chapters, he writes of loosening dietary restrictions, with the increasing trend of dieting books that say "it's ok to be fat" and argue that there are ways to lose weight without giving up high fat foods (Atkins!). He also includes bits like how clothing companies change sizes around so that size 8 gets larger and larger to make people feel better, as well as diet books that claim less exercise can be done to lose weight. This is the part that I was touchiest about. I don't enough about the science and the trends to know about what levels of obesity are dangerous to one's health, and it does seem to be a rather contentious topic these days. And Critser writes with a tone of voice that seems to condemn people for not just wanting to eat everything they want without exercising, but also with the viewpoint that people should really watch their weight.
Hrm. I mean, I agree... to an extent. I'm 130 lb. and 5'4". I say this because sometimes I have no idea if that's fat or not. This is because for pretty much as long as I can remember, my mom has been telling me to exercise and watch what I eat and lose some weight, with the exception of freshmen year, when I dropped to 115 lb., looked (according to my sister) slightly skeletal. I am really sick of being told to watch my weight and to watch what I eat. I know all the health reasons, etc. etc. etc., but for once, I would like to go home and have the first thing people say to me NOT be about my weight! Every single time I go home and meet people, invariably one of the first comments will be whether I have gained weight or lost weight. Not just with my family -- with almost every single family friend or person who has seen me the previous year. It drives me crazy. The culture of sitting around at the table and pretending that you have to watch what you eat when there's perfectly tasty food in front of you drives me crazy too. I like food. I hate it when people watch me scarf down a giant sandwich and say "wow, I can't believe you eat that much." I don't know anyone who is happy with their weight and doesn't want to lose some.
I mean, I can't say about everyone, but for me, Critser's argument that people just want to eat all they want with no guilt and no need to exercise feels like the flip side of this constant barrage of messages saying you must be skinny, you must be skinny, if you are not skinny, you are lazy and ugly and worthless, which is a horrid message.
On the other hand, I do agree with other points that he makes about the cheapness of fast food and the easy accessability of it and other not-so-nutritionally-wonderful foods to kids, especially in schools. I don't know enough about his entire chapter on the evils of obesity on the health to comment. But in general I figure it's usually better to eat stuff fresh. I don't know. I'm not really a nutritionist. I just eat stuff that tastes good, and I've found that for some reason I can start tasting this chemical aftertaste with some food, and so I've been avoiding those. And I do agree about the portions, because compared to Taiwan portions, portions here are huge! Of course, I won't complain that much because it means I can take home half of my lunch and eat it for dinner because I'm cheap.
Not much of a conclusion from me, except that I wish I knew more so that I comment more in depth on the issues that Critser raises.
The subtitle of the book pretty much summarizes what Critser is looking to convince the reader of, and in one of the chapters, he writes of loosening dietary restrictions, with the increasing trend of dieting books that say "it's ok to be fat" and argue that there are ways to lose weight without giving up high fat foods (Atkins!). He also includes bits like how clothing companies change sizes around so that size 8 gets larger and larger to make people feel better, as well as diet books that claim less exercise can be done to lose weight. This is the part that I was touchiest about. I don't enough about the science and the trends to know about what levels of obesity are dangerous to one's health, and it does seem to be a rather contentious topic these days. And Critser writes with a tone of voice that seems to condemn people for not just wanting to eat everything they want without exercising, but also with the viewpoint that people should really watch their weight.
Hrm. I mean, I agree... to an extent. I'm 130 lb. and 5'4". I say this because sometimes I have no idea if that's fat or not. This is because for pretty much as long as I can remember, my mom has been telling me to exercise and watch what I eat and lose some weight, with the exception of freshmen year, when I dropped to 115 lb., looked (according to my sister) slightly skeletal. I am really sick of being told to watch my weight and to watch what I eat. I know all the health reasons, etc. etc. etc., but for once, I would like to go home and have the first thing people say to me NOT be about my weight! Every single time I go home and meet people, invariably one of the first comments will be whether I have gained weight or lost weight. Not just with my family -- with almost every single family friend or person who has seen me the previous year. It drives me crazy. The culture of sitting around at the table and pretending that you have to watch what you eat when there's perfectly tasty food in front of you drives me crazy too. I like food. I hate it when people watch me scarf down a giant sandwich and say "wow, I can't believe you eat that much." I don't know anyone who is happy with their weight and doesn't want to lose some.
I mean, I can't say about everyone, but for me, Critser's argument that people just want to eat all they want with no guilt and no need to exercise feels like the flip side of this constant barrage of messages saying you must be skinny, you must be skinny, if you are not skinny, you are lazy and ugly and worthless, which is a horrid message.
On the other hand, I do agree with other points that he makes about the cheapness of fast food and the easy accessability of it and other not-so-nutritionally-wonderful foods to kids, especially in schools. I don't know enough about his entire chapter on the evils of obesity on the health to comment. But in general I figure it's usually better to eat stuff fresh. I don't know. I'm not really a nutritionist. I just eat stuff that tastes good, and I've found that for some reason I can start tasting this chemical aftertaste with some food, and so I've been avoiding those. And I do agree about the portions, because compared to Taiwan portions, portions here are huge! Of course, I won't complain that much because it means I can take home half of my lunch and eat it for dinner because I'm cheap.
Not much of a conclusion from me, except that I wish I knew more so that I comment more in depth on the issues that Critser raises.
Tags:
(no subject)
Sat, Apr. 9th, 2005 11:25 pm (UTC)And, while I know this doesn't carry much weight with anyone at all, I certainly wouldn't even consider you overweight. You seem like a perfectly nice size, all height-weight proportional and leaning towards slender, and I wouldn't say that anyone at 130 and 5'4" was fat anyhow. I'm your same height, and 140 is my goal weight to feel fine, wiht 130 a sort of "dream weight" I haven't been at since junior high. So, in summation, not fat. :)
(no subject)
Mon, Apr. 11th, 2005 01:46 pm (UTC)Re: the weight thing, it is so weird because in my head I figure I am fairly healthy and whatnot (ok, maybe I should exercise more because I am getting out of breath climbing the stairs...), and in general I feel I have a good attitude toward food, but there are times when I can always find someone thinner and better looking than me.
It also doesn't help that when I go home, everything changes dramatically. I wear L or XL back in Taiwan, and I am definitely one of the more heavy-set girls there of my height. It is really frustrating not being able to buy pants there at all or to always have to ask for the biggest sizes. And people there are much more vocal about weight things, so salesladies will comment on whether or not you can fit something! Grrrr. Very different. Very frustrating. Also very schizophrenic bouncing from one standard to the other for me.
(no subject)
Sun, Apr. 10th, 2005 12:03 am (UTC)Not to get all in yr personal space, but according to the BMI (just a number that shows body weight adjusted for height) calculator, which I tend to trust more than anything (altho even that can still be a bit faulty), five feet four and weighing 130 means you have a BMI of 22.3, which is FINE. That's even below the "normal" range (overweight is considered to be 25.0–29.9). Anyone who tells you to watch what you eat and that you eat too much is NUTS, as well as just plain rude. Five-four and 115 is a BMI of 19.7, which is indeed close to underweight (that's considered to be below 18.5 altho I think that's too LOW -- I'm six feet and when I weighed 145 lbs I was drastically underweight, and my BMI was 19.7 then too, and I was amenorrheic). The average American woman is supposedly 5'4" tall and weighs 140 pounds, so you are BELOW that (and that is a BMI of 24, just under normal, 18.5–24.9).
So you know, if you wanted to, you could politely say "I am healthy and don't have any major health problems and my Body Mass Index is well within normal parameters for my height, so please don't worry about how much I weigh." Because noone should be pulling that stuff (well noone should be pulling that kind of stuff on anyone regardless of weight. But in yr case it REALLY sounds just like BS).
(no subject)
Sun, Apr. 10th, 2005 09:55 am (UTC)Other interesting books on that front: Marion Nestle's Food Politics, which is incredibly depressing with regards to food recommendations/regulations in the US (one of my friends who's a FDA inspector handed it to me); and Gary Nabhan's Why Some Like It Hot has some incredibly suggestive material on how different populations have different optimal diets and different reactions to the same foods in like quantities; that last is unfortunately a very fast read, written for the very general reader, but there's a pretty extensive bibliography I mean to trawl someday.
And I wish people would take build into account. My build is sort of sticklike, which holds for almost all the women on my mother's side. (No women on father's side available for comparison.) Joe is a bit shorter than his brother, and weighs fairly less, because Joe inherited the lighter build of his mother's side and his brother is a bulkier, more solidly built guy who bred true to the big German stock or somethiing on their father's side. ^_^
But truly: if you can do the things you need to do without getting horribly out of breath, and you feel fine and at balance, and you aren't having medical problems, for goshsake just enjoy your food.
(I have the opposite problem with relatives to you,
(no subject)
Sun, Apr. 10th, 2005 07:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Sun, Apr. 10th, 2005 07:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Fri, Apr. 15th, 2005 06:28 pm (UTC)I totally get the cheap food = bad food. I'm trying to keep to my budget now, and I am finding that I am eating a whole lot of microwave stuff and mac and cheese and TV dinners.
I technically know that being my weight is ok for my height, but I still feel fat sometimes. It's really frustrating. Well, part of it is a strange standard, because while I'm considered a fairly good weight here, back at home in Taiwan, the girls are stick thin and I'm size L. And the whole culture there is just much more concerned with weight or genetically more disposed toward thinness, or I have no idea, but it's still really frustrating not being able to find any pants that will fit me there.
(no subject)
Sat, Apr. 16th, 2005 01:29 am (UTC)I wonder if there are women in America (or indeed, in the world) who feel thin -- who look in the mirror and think, "Yep, I'm thin -- perfectly happy here." Not many of them, probably (and if there are, maybe they worry they're too thin). And not being able to find pants in a country, oh, man....
(no subject)
Sun, Apr. 17th, 2005 07:39 pm (UTC)*sigh*
(no subject)
Sun, Apr. 17th, 2005 07:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Sun, Apr. 10th, 2005 12:35 am (UTC)((sigh)) Sorry, I'll now go off to froth and foam elsewhere....
(no subject)
Sun, Apr. 10th, 2005 02:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Sun, Apr. 10th, 2005 04:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Sun, Apr. 10th, 2005 10:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Sun, Apr. 10th, 2005 07:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Sun, Apr. 10th, 2005 11:19 pm (UTC)Oh, that's fairly obvious. I thought that the failings of BtVS7 and AtS5 would have stopped people from putting everything bad in BtVS6 down to Marti, but it seems like quite a few people still hold her personally responsible for Buffy/Spike not going the way they hoped
when they wrote smoochy Spuffy stuff before the ship was canon.(no subject)
Sun, Apr. 10th, 2005 11:43 pm (UTC)You would think (particularly Buffy S7).
(no subject)
Sun, Apr. 10th, 2005 04:54 am (UTC)There is no evidence whatsoever that allowing people to buy clothes that fit them will encourage them to stay overweight or obese. None. It's just nonsense. I object to vanity sizing myself on the grounds that it has vanity sized me out of clothes at more than one store, and on the grounds that when I say to my mom, "The 4s are too big here," she gets upset with me, not the clothing manufacturers. But I don't think it makes anyone too complacent to lose weight. Fat people know they're fat. It's just that thin people suspect they're fat, too.
(no subject)
Fri, Apr. 15th, 2005 06:30 pm (UTC)