Fantasy Couple, ep. 01-04
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 03:01 pmAnna is a filthy rich woman who has spent several years (or most of her life? I can't tell) in the US. She's recently moved back to Korea, much to the dismay of her browbeaten, bullied husband, who married her for her money but who also seems to have loved her once. Jang Chul Soo is a handyman trying to pinch pennies, since he's raising his dead brother's three sons. They anti-meet-cute when he helps her with her car, and she mistakes him for a murderer and beats his head in with a shovel.
Eventually, she gets amnesia (my first amnesia drama! a milestone!), and he ends up convincing her she's his girlfriend to save on housekeeping bills and to get back the money she owes him.
Normally, this premise would have me hating the hero from the get-go. While I wasn't very fond of Jang Chul Soo in the beginning, I at least don't want to whap him multiple times because of his scheme, largely due to the slapstick tone of the drama. In the beginning, the humor is extremely broad -- Anna's snobbiness and meanness is hugely exaggerated, to the point where even I didn't like her, and I usually like "bitchy" women (scarequotes for problematics surrounding use of "bitchy" as descriptor, not to imply the women aren't actually mean). I have some problems with this, namely that the heroes of kdramas seem to be allowed to be alpha male and aggressive and often plain mean in a way heroines aren't; if heroines are, it has to be shown as being wrong. I was also completely unconvinced of the viability of Anna and Chul Soo as a couple, and I was (and am) bored by her husband's storyline.
That said, the third and fourth episode either improve tremendously, or I got used to the broad humor and started to like it. The entire thing with Anna knowing so little about housework that she makes things worse and not better is totally expected, but I still thought it was funny, largely because of Chul Soo's expressions. That, and the very cute laundry-in-a-tub scene.
Chul Soo's softening much faster than Anna is, despite Anna's (very few) moments of weakness, and that while the joke seems to be on Anna most of the time, it always ends up being on Chul Soo. Well, that, and they're hilariously cute when they bond over finding money. I am even growing fond of the snooty way she tosses her hair.
Am having the same class issues with this one that I have had with most of the other series I've seen (moral uprightness of being poor coupled with fetishization of the filthy rich lifestyle), ditto with race issues (socializing with white people as sign of breeding and wealth, knowledge of English as shortcut to coolness). But it's making me laugh, so I will probably keep watching.
Also, this show makes me crave jajangmyeon like crazy, even though I have only had it once in my life. Must find restaurant around here with it, so I can have some, though may settle for zhajiangmien if I can't find jajangmyeon.
Eventually, she gets amnesia (my first amnesia drama! a milestone!), and he ends up convincing her she's his girlfriend to save on housekeeping bills and to get back the money she owes him.
Normally, this premise would have me hating the hero from the get-go. While I wasn't very fond of Jang Chul Soo in the beginning, I at least don't want to whap him multiple times because of his scheme, largely due to the slapstick tone of the drama. In the beginning, the humor is extremely broad -- Anna's snobbiness and meanness is hugely exaggerated, to the point where even I didn't like her, and I usually like "bitchy" women (scarequotes for problematics surrounding use of "bitchy" as descriptor, not to imply the women aren't actually mean). I have some problems with this, namely that the heroes of kdramas seem to be allowed to be alpha male and aggressive and often plain mean in a way heroines aren't; if heroines are, it has to be shown as being wrong. I was also completely unconvinced of the viability of Anna and Chul Soo as a couple, and I was (and am) bored by her husband's storyline.
That said, the third and fourth episode either improve tremendously, or I got used to the broad humor and started to like it. The entire thing with Anna knowing so little about housework that she makes things worse and not better is totally expected, but I still thought it was funny, largely because of Chul Soo's expressions. That, and the very cute laundry-in-a-tub scene.
Chul Soo's softening much faster than Anna is, despite Anna's (very few) moments of weakness, and that while the joke seems to be on Anna most of the time, it always ends up being on Chul Soo. Well, that, and they're hilariously cute when they bond over finding money. I am even growing fond of the snooty way she tosses her hair.
Am having the same class issues with this one that I have had with most of the other series I've seen (moral uprightness of being poor coupled with fetishization of the filthy rich lifestyle), ditto with race issues (socializing with white people as sign of breeding and wealth, knowledge of English as shortcut to coolness). But it's making me laugh, so I will probably keep watching.
Also, this show makes me crave jajangmyeon like crazy, even though I have only had it once in my life. Must find restaurant around here with it, so I can have some, though may settle for zhajiangmien if I can't find jajangmyeon.
Tags:
(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:08 pm (UTC)I think it really hits its stride about mid-way through, when it starts showing the differences between being outwardly and inwardly good and generous, and when it starts forcing Anna to make choices and decisions.
(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:09 pm (UTC)Jjajangmyeon! It used to be one of my sister's favorite foods, although I wonder if that's now seolleongtang. My personal favorite is naengmyeon (cold noodles), which I like even in the winter. But I'd take jjajangmyeon, too. (The double jj indicates a fortis ["tensified"] consonant.)
(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:15 pm (UTC)Yeah, there was a lot of that attitude in Taiwan too -- American and America were all good and cool, as long as it was white America.
Oh! Now I am confused -- Wikipedia said it's not actually the double jj because that signifies non-Chinese foreign words (??), but the subtitlers had it. I have no clue.
Ooo, what's seolleongtang? One of my coworkers said I had to try naengmyeon and took me to a place, though she said it wasn't as good as Korea's (of course). Ok, now I am really craving noodles! I think kdramas are to blame for my recent comfort Asian food kick (I was on a comfort American food kick a few months ago).
(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:33 pm (UTC)Seolleongtang is beef soup of some kind. I think it's only okay, but my sister likes it a lot. (Or she did last I checked, anyway.) Of course, right now I'd definitely take "only okay" Korean foods out of sheer nostalgia.
(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:39 pm (UTC)Oh man. I wish I could go with you and Rachel to LA's Ktown or something, in lieu of a trip to Korea.
(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted byP.S.
Posted byRe: P.S.
Posted byRe: P.S.
Posted byRe: P.S.
Posted by(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:36 pm (UTC)I swear this was a bad American movie back in the 80s. I can't remember what it was called or who was in it, though...
(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:48 pm (UTC)I *cough* am kinda fond of the movie...as a guilty pleasure.
I think the drama handles the story, better...the movie more tried to justify his actions, where the drama couldn't be any clearer that he was wrongwrongwrong and screwed up big time, but can't fix it.
(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Fri, Jan. 11th, 2008 12:05 am (UTC)I'm so glad I wasn't just imagining the similarity--it's intentional!
(no subject)
Fri, Jan. 11th, 2008 12:07 am (UTC)Mostly similarities that obvious are intentional...it's just whether or not it's admitted.
(no subject)
Thu, Jan. 10th, 2008 11:53 pm (UTC)*Soldier would be a bulletproof-kink-movie for me were it not so indescribably awful in every conceivable way.
(no subject)
Fri, Jan. 11th, 2008 12:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Fri, Jan. 11th, 2008 12:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Fri, Jan. 11th, 2008 05:07 am (UTC)Of course, b/c this makes PERFECT SENSE! I think the ridiculousness charms me more than the standard-American-sitcom ridiculousness b/c it's such a crazy mix of real and over-the-top.
(no subject)
Mon, Jan. 14th, 2008 11:12 pm (UTC)