Willingham, Bill - Fables: Homelands and Arabian Nights (and Days)

[oyceter]

For the record, Arabian Nights (and Days) is why I am not going to be reading Fables anymore.

I've previously had issues with politics and gender in Fables, and this one is the last straw. That said, it's one freaking huge straw.

Orientalist stereotypes for the win! (also, spoilers)

I was already very wary when they mentioned the introduction of the Arabian Fables as refugees. On the one hand, yay, non-white people and non-European cultures! On the other hand, wow, does Willingham screw it up.

First of all, the Arabian Fables all speak horrible English. I will say that Willingham at least shows them speaking fluent Arabic. On the other hand, I don't remember if Baba Yaga had English problems when she crossed over to Fabletown, and Red Riding Hood certainly isn't, so why the Arabian Fables? coffeeandink also pointed out that it's not like Arabian Nights hasn't been translated into English; Willingham certianly could have given them some fluency using that logic. Furthermore, they are made fun of for speaking unintelligible English.

(Yes, I know, they mock Beauty for not understanding that an Arabian Fable is saying that he will kill everyone or something, but NOT THE SAME.)

I was minorly annoyed by the fact that the Arabian Fables speak Arabic like this: "Sirrah, this kind of behavior from the infidels is not to be tolerated! Give me the word, master, and I will avenge this insult to you. I can slit a thousand throats this night without disturbing anyone's sleep" (emphasis in the original).

This wouldn't have annoyed me quite as much had the big issue been: OMG! The Arabian Fables keep slaves!

Even the completely amoral, good-for-nothing Prince Charming is shown balking at this, even though in the past, Fabletown has had a sheriff that used to be a murderer. I am not saying murder is worse than slavery or that slavery should ever be tolerated; I am saying that Willingham is using this as a lazy shorthand to create conflict between the backwards Arabian Fables and the enlightened Western Fables.

At least there is Sinbad, the ruler of the Arabian Fables, who is shown as reasonable and good.

Of course, he's shown as reasonable and good because he listens to the Western Fables and advocates westernization while his second-in-command (drawn with a hooked nose, pointy beard and curly mustache in the worst of caricatures) betrays him to gather power and criticizes Sinbad for being too western. (in picture: Yusuf on left, Sinbad on right)

Then there's the charming and pleasant plot in which our noble and brave Fables discover that the Arabian Fables have brought djinn with them, which, Willingham and the characters tell us, is the Fable equivalent of a nuclear weapon. I kid you not. All of the Arabian Fables are detained and jailed, and not as a commentary on anti-Muslim hysteria post-9/11. Instead, it's shown as a regrettable but understable act, given the information they have, and in no way shows any indication that this may potentially be problematic given the political climate today. After being imprisoned for no reason he can discern, Sinbad says that he brought it in to keep it from the Adversary, trusting in his people to not touch it.

Cole replies: "I'm afraid that's not good enough, Sinbad." (Cole has been shown to be the rational intermediary throughout the volume and looks somewhat sorrowful but also stern.)

This is somewhat mitigated by the fact that Sinbad shows them that they still have access to Baghdad in the Homelands and therefore have power there, but the very next page has Beauty attempting to understand another Arabian Fable (in full turban and regalia, of course) who is telling her that he is the master of poisons and strangling.

To top it all off, the back cover copy jokingly notes: "But the arrival in Fabletown of a delegation from the Arabian Homelands shows just how tricky this kind of coalition-building can be -- especially when one side is concealing Weapons of Magical Destruction!"

The only reason why I finished reading that arc was so I could blog about it knowing that Willingham didn't suddenly retract something. After that, I threw the book in disgust at the floor. Quite honestly, if it hadn't been a library book, I probably would have thrown it against the wall repeatedly, as just once doesn't even begin to encompass how disgusted I am with it.

ETA: all anonymous comments on this post now screened, thanks to the appearance of trolls!