Dunnett, Dorothy - Checkmate
Tue, Jul. 20th, 2004 03:12 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
oyceterI'm still sort of vaguely blah from the loss of the entire Lymond world, but luckily found Figgs and Phantoms in the store. Except now I have a real hankering to reread Perlious Gard, given the Elizabethan period thing. Hrm.
It's so strange how I feel such a loss because I've finished a series, but it hurts.
Dunnett broke Philippa =(.
I loved this book even though I could pretty much see Dunnett pulling all the strings to get Lymond and Philippa together. It does, however, vaguely amuse me that the last book in the Lymond books is basically a romance novel. Dunnett also uses pretty much every single cliche in the book, but it works for me because there's the weight of five other books of characterization and events behind this one.
First we've got Lymond secretly in love with Philippa but valiantly denying it because he doesn't think he's worthy of her, and the angst that comes from watching Philippa jest with him and not realize that he's in love with her. Then we've got Philippa in love with someone she thinks is in love with another person (the in love with her mother thing is an extra twist), and the ensuing reader angst that comes with her not knowing he's talking about her.
Oh I forgot. First of all, we have the marriage of convenience, a time-honored romance tradition ;).
Added to this is the childhood-crush syndrome, or the "he doesn't notice her because he thinks she is still a child although she's been growing up while he wasn't looking" thing. "While he wasn't looking" in this case being, "while he was in Russia attempting to take over the eastern hemisphere."
Then both of them are courting the Wrong People, causing both of them angst because of the mutual not-knowing, and then, the wonderful scene in which Lymond reveals to Philippa who he's really in love with, and then proceeds to tell her that they can't be together because of his mysterious birth and dark past, assuming she is only infatuated with him and that it will pass.
Added to all this is the immense angst of Lymond's headaches and loss of sight and suicide attempts and Philippa's attempts to keep him and the Crawfords safe from Leonard Bailey and the Lennoxes. And half the people close to them violently opposing the marriage, and another half attempting to get them to stay married (I am quite impressed and amused with Dunnett getting both the star-crossed lovers separated by fate effect and then then yentas/destined to be together thing all in one).
Then comes the scene when Lymond does realize Philippa is as deeply in love with him as he is with her (gah, I love this scene). And right before the planned annulment, Philippa breaks herself on Leonard Bailey.
Ow. Although why is it that usually the women are broken and tortured by bad sex and/or rape whereas men are broken by death of family members/betrayal of past lovers/maniacal egotistical enemies/mysterious pasts/all of the above and the women react by not being able to touch while the men react by having to have meaningless sex all the time?
It's strange, considering everything that goes on in the Lymond books, but the biggest stretch for me was the notion that Lymond simply could not live without sex or touch. I think it makes sense psychologically, but as a non-touchy-feely person myself and after having read too many books in which the hero cannot control his own sex drive, it was a bit too much.
Anyhow, on with the cliches. So now we have the happy couple completely in concord in terms of mind and spirit but now unable to touch and all the angst that ensues from that. Said couple then separates because of that, despite pining for each other and being perfect for each other. Then suicide attempt the second, then capture by enemy, then death in front of Philippa's eyes... I nearly freaked out at this part, because I was sort of skimming and saw the last line of the chapter, Jerott mourning, "My beloved is dead" and thought it was Lymond. And I kind of thought Lymond was going to have a happy ending, but Dunnett doesn't really pull her punches.
And happy last bit in which the heroine is miraculously cured of her fear of being touched.
I poke fun, but I loved every second of it, and, as I said, I think it works because we've had five books of background, watching Philippa grow up, watching Lymond and how he interacts with people. Too often the cliches of "in love but never able to show it because of evil enemy" don't work because the enemy is never evil enough, whereas we've had very concrete evidence throughout the first five books that whoever Lymond touches, he does a pretty good hatchet job on their lives, inadvertantly or not. And the dark past/unworthy of heroine sort of works as well because the reader has gone through many of the horrible things Lymond has done, and because Dunnett doesn't always try to justify it morally. She allows Lymond to be very, very grey. I think too often authors try to have it both ways -- have a scary, angsty hero, but then they want the readers to like him, so it turns out he was never that bad to begin with, which really wreaks havoc with the dramatic tension.
However, I could have lived without knowing that Lymond was indeed the true heir of Culter -- poor Richard!
I think one of the problems with Checkmate (and with Ringed Castle) is that Dunnett never manages to find an archenemy quite as scary as Gabriel, or a dilemma quite as painful as the chess game in Pawn. So the climax of Checkmate isn't the resolution of the big problem of the book, but rather, the resolution of Lymond and Philippa's relationship. She does try to tie it with the main plot of the book, but it doesn't quite work out as well as the tie of the emotions and the actions in Pawn, so that both hit their climax at the same, horrible moment.
Anyhow, despite this, I loved loved loved the book and the series (as pretty much everyone can tell from the previous emotional posts), and I've reread the ending about ten times already.
I'm making the boy buy me the books for my birthday ^_^.
Links:
-![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
rachelmanija's review
It's so strange how I feel such a loss because I've finished a series, but it hurts.
Dunnett broke Philippa =(.
I loved this book even though I could pretty much see Dunnett pulling all the strings to get Lymond and Philippa together. It does, however, vaguely amuse me that the last book in the Lymond books is basically a romance novel. Dunnett also uses pretty much every single cliche in the book, but it works for me because there's the weight of five other books of characterization and events behind this one.
First we've got Lymond secretly in love with Philippa but valiantly denying it because he doesn't think he's worthy of her, and the angst that comes from watching Philippa jest with him and not realize that he's in love with her. Then we've got Philippa in love with someone she thinks is in love with another person (the in love with her mother thing is an extra twist), and the ensuing reader angst that comes with her not knowing he's talking about her.
Oh I forgot. First of all, we have the marriage of convenience, a time-honored romance tradition ;).
Added to this is the childhood-crush syndrome, or the "he doesn't notice her because he thinks she is still a child although she's been growing up while he wasn't looking" thing. "While he wasn't looking" in this case being, "while he was in Russia attempting to take over the eastern hemisphere."
Then both of them are courting the Wrong People, causing both of them angst because of the mutual not-knowing, and then, the wonderful scene in which Lymond reveals to Philippa who he's really in love with, and then proceeds to tell her that they can't be together because of his mysterious birth and dark past, assuming she is only infatuated with him and that it will pass.
Added to all this is the immense angst of Lymond's headaches and loss of sight and suicide attempts and Philippa's attempts to keep him and the Crawfords safe from Leonard Bailey and the Lennoxes. And half the people close to them violently opposing the marriage, and another half attempting to get them to stay married (I am quite impressed and amused with Dunnett getting both the star-crossed lovers separated by fate effect and then then yentas/destined to be together thing all in one).
Then comes the scene when Lymond does realize Philippa is as deeply in love with him as he is with her (gah, I love this scene). And right before the planned annulment, Philippa breaks herself on Leonard Bailey.
Ow. Although why is it that usually the women are broken and tortured by bad sex and/or rape whereas men are broken by death of family members/betrayal of past lovers/maniacal egotistical enemies/mysterious pasts/all of the above and the women react by not being able to touch while the men react by having to have meaningless sex all the time?
It's strange, considering everything that goes on in the Lymond books, but the biggest stretch for me was the notion that Lymond simply could not live without sex or touch. I think it makes sense psychologically, but as a non-touchy-feely person myself and after having read too many books in which the hero cannot control his own sex drive, it was a bit too much.
Anyhow, on with the cliches. So now we have the happy couple completely in concord in terms of mind and spirit but now unable to touch and all the angst that ensues from that. Said couple then separates because of that, despite pining for each other and being perfect for each other. Then suicide attempt the second, then capture by enemy, then death in front of Philippa's eyes... I nearly freaked out at this part, because I was sort of skimming and saw the last line of the chapter, Jerott mourning, "My beloved is dead" and thought it was Lymond. And I kind of thought Lymond was going to have a happy ending, but Dunnett doesn't really pull her punches.
And happy last bit in which the heroine is miraculously cured of her fear of being touched.
I poke fun, but I loved every second of it, and, as I said, I think it works because we've had five books of background, watching Philippa grow up, watching Lymond and how he interacts with people. Too often the cliches of "in love but never able to show it because of evil enemy" don't work because the enemy is never evil enough, whereas we've had very concrete evidence throughout the first five books that whoever Lymond touches, he does a pretty good hatchet job on their lives, inadvertantly or not. And the dark past/unworthy of heroine sort of works as well because the reader has gone through many of the horrible things Lymond has done, and because Dunnett doesn't always try to justify it morally. She allows Lymond to be very, very grey. I think too often authors try to have it both ways -- have a scary, angsty hero, but then they want the readers to like him, so it turns out he was never that bad to begin with, which really wreaks havoc with the dramatic tension.
However, I could have lived without knowing that Lymond was indeed the true heir of Culter -- poor Richard!
I think one of the problems with Checkmate (and with Ringed Castle) is that Dunnett never manages to find an archenemy quite as scary as Gabriel, or a dilemma quite as painful as the chess game in Pawn. So the climax of Checkmate isn't the resolution of the big problem of the book, but rather, the resolution of Lymond and Philippa's relationship. She does try to tie it with the main plot of the book, but it doesn't quite work out as well as the tie of the emotions and the actions in Pawn, so that both hit their climax at the same, horrible moment.
Anyhow, despite this, I loved loved loved the book and the series (as pretty much everyone can tell from the previous emotional posts), and I've reread the ending about ten times already.
I'm making the boy buy me the books for my birthday ^_^.
Links:
-
rachelmanija's review
(no subject)
Thu, Jul. 22nd, 2004 11:07 am (UTC)Well, I am a total sap too - I can stand 99% complete tragedy if I'm given even a fairly implausible happy ending ;) (Atonement completely broke my heart!!)
Actually, that's my general problem with happy endings. I always want to see what happens after the "happily ever after."
Right, and in this instance, we KNOW Lymond is prone to bouts of extreme guilt and self-loathing and that he is one messed-up dude - and somehow I don't think being able to sleep with Philippa is going to solve all his problems in that regard.
Also, I'm sad to think of Jerrott as a monk. I want a totally Mary-Sue scenario where he finds some jolly not-at-all like Marthe girl who makes him happy ;)
I'm really tempted to read the Niccolo books now for a fix, but I think I would keel over from sheer lack of sleep!
I would really recommend waiting on those. For one thing, the hero is so different from Lymond that a lot of people who love Lymond dislike him, and vice versa (i.e. people who read Niccolo first find Lymond insufferable, which he is, but I love him anyway.)
Actually, the VERY first Dunnett novel I ever read was King Hereafter, which is about Thorfinn the Earl of Orkney (aka Macbeth, or so she posits, anyway) and I LOVED it. So you might want to give that one a try.
(no subject)
Thu, Jul. 22nd, 2004 02:53 pm (UTC)I'm vaguely amusing myself in rereading Perilous Gard because both Philippa and Kate Sutton have met Elizabeth, Roger Ascham and Blanche. Ah, crossover fanfiction time!
(no subject)
Fri, Jul. 23rd, 2004 04:06 pm (UTC)Word. The reactions to each series vary widely depending on which you read first. Also, hard-core Romantics tend to prefer the LC to the HN, I believe. The HN is also about politics and battles, but it's also more about business, which leaves me a bit... bored. Alum and cod aren't all that exciting to me, not like the Knights of Malta.
That said, the language in the HN is much more accessible and less baroque than in the LC, and many people prefer that. There are quite as many plot twists and hidden agendas, betrayals and seductions, and fabulously-drawn secondary characters. But like
(Oh, for the days of the GUACT...)
Second the recommendation for King Hereafter, which is a tour de force. Brilliant and heartbreaking, and yet another use of the Golden Boy archetype she likes to set up and overthrow.
(no subject)
Fri, Jul. 23rd, 2004 08:34 pm (UTC)*sniff* I don't understand how I can dislike him through most of the books and fall splat in Checkmate. I still feeling like running around squealing, "Lymond/Philippa OTP OMG theirloveissotormented!" despite having a general problem with epic, star-crossed lovers.
It's Sevigny. I blame it all on Sevigny.
(no subject)
Mon, Jul. 26th, 2004 10:34 am (UTC)Hee! Well, I studied economic history and I can get pretty thrilled by something like Fernand Braudel's studies of the Mediterranean in the age of Philip II (which is a bit later than the Niccolo books, but same general idea ;)), so that wasn't the part that bugged me. I think it was actually the way that Niccolo changed which so emphasized what I consider Dunnett's slightly regrettable emphasis on "breeding/blood will out." And I shall say no more b/c of spoilers! But I did find the writing more accessible...
And absolutely true about the Golden Boy in King Hereafter - I actually had to read that three times through before I could BEAR to read the ending and have never been able to read it since. SOB! But I still loved it ;)
(no subject)
Mon, Jul. 26th, 2004 03:07 pm (UTC)