oyceter: Stack of books with text "mmm... books!" (mmm books)
This is both more and less gruesome than the title implies. I am rather squeamish about the subject, but all the blurbs (and there are many of them) say that the book is surprisingly funny. It is. It's also still a little squeamish. Usually the two happen at the same time.

Roach isn't a scientist, and the book isn't even pop science. It's just an interesting look at the various things that happen to cadavers, from organ donation to anatomy class, cremation to "organic burial," and some things that I wouldn't have thought of, like research into crucifixion.

I personally didn't particularly ever feel a desire to know exactly how a dead body decomposes, but now that I do, it's strangely fascinating. All the topics tend to be fairly depressing, since most people who use cadavers in research tend to do so to find ways to save more lives, due to the somewhat problematic PR involved.

So I know about stages of decomposition and how it helps people pin down details of a murder, how different ways airplanes crash affect the way the people are strewn about, precisely how a car crash can kill people, and etc.

You'd think this would be morbid, but Roach is genuinely curious (and has some rather curious questions of her own), and she's a great narrator. Also, her rather matter-of-fact attitude contrasts with what her interviewees expect, leading to some hilarious exchanges ("If I said that I liked the smell of burning flesh, would that be disturbing?").

And yet, Roach never makes fun of the dead or of their families; the humor is largely in the situation. I also found the chapters on organ donation and composting particularly touching. And even though the families of people who wished to donate their bodies to science will object, Roach makes a good point in that the family should do what lets them live with themselves, not necessarily what the deceased wanted (with the exception of organ donation).

I suspect people who liked the parasite portions of Scott Westerfeld's Peeps will also like this book.

I ended up liking this book even more than I liked Spook. Highly recommended, and I'm going to try to dig up quotes as soon as I get home.
oyceter: Stack of books with text "mmm... books!" (mmm books)
Despite the subtitle, Spook isn't actually a scientific debunking of various beliefs and practices surrounding the afterlife. Rather, Mary Roach undergoes a sort of journey to see what her take on things like reincarnation, near-death experiences and psychics is.

Roach is a bit of a skeptic, though I wouldn't say she's extraordinarily skeptical. But that may be because I'm a bit of a skeptic myself when it comes to these sorts of things. Mostly she finds that when it comes to the afterlife, none of the studies she witnesses or the people she talks to really convinces her of anything, although there are one or to moments in which she begins to wonder. Mostly it's just fun going around with her in the book and reading her opinions on things, particularly when she joins a school for mediums.

The chapter that I found the most interesting was the one on near-death experiences, but that may just be because I read Connie Willis' Passage, which has a good deal about NDEs in it.

Luckily, the strength of the book isn't in scientific debunking or anything of the sort. Roach just goes around and seems to have a great deal of fun poking her nose into various things, and she's got a wry narrative voice which is extremely fun to read. Spook actually ended up being much funnier than I thought it would be, despite [livejournal.com profile] rachelmanija telling me that it was pretty fun. Also, I'd tell people to read it if only for the irreverent but never mean-spirited commentary and footnotes!

Profile

oyceter: teruterubouzu default icon (Default)
Oyceter

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718 19202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Active Entries

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags