Mon, Apr. 16th, 2012

oyceter: Stack of books with text "mmm... books!" (mmm books)
Third book of the Inheritance Trilogy (Book 1 (no spoilers), Book 2 (spoilers))

Disclaimer: I know and like the author. Also, this write up is even more outside the norm in that I read a draft for the book in 2010.

The back cover copy says that this book is about Shahar, the current heir to the Arameri throne, but it really is about Sieh and his godling-ness. I knew this going in, given the draft I had read, but I'm still a bit disappointed, since I would very much like to read the book that the back cover copy describes.

The Kingdom of Gods is largely about wrapping up the fallout that begins with Book 1 of the trilogy, although thankfully, each book can be read by itself. As previously mentioned, it follows Sieh as he adjusts to some odd changes in his situation, starting with his befriending the young Arameri twins Shahar and Deka.

Sieh was one of my favorites from The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms, and although I still like him a great deal, I'm not sure the decision to write the book from Sieh's POV entirely worked for me. You see, Sieh is the god of childhood, so despite his millennia of being and his vast amounts of power, he gains the most power when he is truly embodying the spirit of childhood. Unfortunately, I don't think the narration quite captured that. I very much loved Jemisin's voice in the first book of the trilogy, was a bit meh about it in the second, and I'm a bit meh about it here as well. I think she writes elegant, high fantasy voice extremely well, but I didn't completely buy street-smart Oree or childish Sieh. Sieh's voice in particular feels too deliberate for me; even the bits of childish retorts or brattiness don't read as very spontaneous.

The politics are much more interesting, although I was frustrated at being limited to Sieh's POV. The Arameri hold on the Hundred Thousand Kingdoms is falling apart, and although Sieh does have some hand in this, his emotional ties to the situation are fairly weak.

Spoilers )

Overall, the book combines a mortal political plot with the political plotting of the gods, as do the other two in the trilogy. I still think the first book ties the two strands together best; many of the weaknesses in this book come from both sides of the plot not being developed enough. We don't get enough of one or the other, so although they're both interesting, they feel in need of fleshing out. Still, it's a really interesting trilogy, and I suspect Jemisin will work out balancing different aspects of a novel over time.

Profile

oyceter: teruterubouzu default icon (Default)
Oyceter

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718 19202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Active Entries

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags