oyceter: (not the magical minority fairy)
Oyceter ([personal profile] oyceter) wrote2007-05-30 04:28 pm

Wiscon 31: What These People Need Is a Honky

Description: Tom Cruise is the Last Samurai. Kevin Costner wins the heart of American Indians with his wolf dancing. Orlando Bloom, in Kingdom of Heaven, goes from medieval England to Jerusalem to teach the Arabs how to sink wells and transport water. Is there anything that can be done about this plague of Orientalist white-guy Mary Sue-ism?

Panelists: Doselle Young, [livejournal.com profile] coniraya, me, Janine Ellen Young (mod)

Props to [livejournal.com profile] vito_excalibur for the Best Panel Title Ever!

Doselle Young ran in, saw me and [livejournal.com profile] coniraya sitting there, gulping down our caffeinated beverages of choice in an attempt to be coherent for the panel, and said, "I'm the moderator?!"

"Yup," we said, still half asleep.

"But I don't want to be the moderator! Being moderator is boring! I think we should rule by anarchy!"

And we probably would have until Janine Ellen Young (Doselle's wife) came in and got stuck as the moderator. There was much joking around about what the panel needed was a honky, as Janine was the only white person on the panel. I think [livejournal.com profile] coniraya (black) joked that he was probably going to get killed off in the first half.

I don't have very good notes on what was said at the panel, since I was mostly trying to concentrate on sounding somewhat intelligent.

I gave a list of movies that may or may not fit the panel description, as largely culled from LJ (LJ knows all!). My caveat is that I got these off the flist and haven't seen most of them. I'm also adding in the titles that came up during the panel itself.

List of movies/books: The Last Samurai, Shogun, The Painted Veil, The Magnificent Seven (? eventually voted off by the audience), Kim, South Pacific, Lost in Translation, Seven Years in Tibet, The King and I, Anna and the king, The Man Who Would Be King (identified as a take on the trope), Dances with Wolves, Geronimo, Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, Windtalkers, Glory, Cry Freedom, Blood Diamond, The Constant Gardener, The Last King of Scotland (as a sort-of take on the trope), Amistad, Kingdom of Heaven, Emerald Forest, Clan of the Cave Bear, Lawrence of Arabia, Return of the Jedi (Ewoks), Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles III, Tears of the Sun, Pathfinder, Tamora Pierce's Trickster and Kel books, and the multitude of movies that fit the "white teacher saving inner city kids" trope. [livejournal.com profile] ladyjax threw out Posse as an example of a good take on the trope.

I summarized the trope as being (please picture scarequotes around all occurences of "natives"): White guy flees from his own culture for personal reasons (to set him up as different from those with white privilege). White guy meets natives. Natives educate white guy. White guy learns the way of natives, possibly also converting a native person who was originally doubtful of him, thereby proving white guy's worthiness. White guy fights for naties. White guy makes dramatic escape while the native guy dies, possibly trying to help the white guy. The movie then ends with a dramatic coda and captions that inform the audience that despite white guy's triumph, the Situation Remains Dire.

The key to all this is that the entire movie is about the white guy's personal growth and realization and that people of color serve only to further the white guy's epiphanies.

"And don't forget, the white guy always gets the sexy native girl! Or a white girl who has been raised native," said one of the panelists.

Janine asked all of us which movie of this type offended us the most, and we all fell silent for a while. "But there are so many!" someone said.

Doselle Young then (or before? I have horrible memories of this panel) talked about a recent movie he saw in which the black character not only sacrificed himself for the white character, a la Terminator 2, but did so singing and dancing. I think I mentioned Cry Freedom because it was the most recent one I had seen and because the first half actually focused on the black character, only to have the entire second half be about the white journalist's escape. There were maybe two black characters in the second half, and the movie was set in South Africa! Coniraya mentioned Phantom Menace (I think); he remembered being so excited about it, only to go in and be slapped in the face with Jar-Jar Binks, the Japanese-sounding evil traders, and the Jewish-sounding merchant/slaveowner.

Janine asked if Lucas was deliberately being racist; all of us thought no, probably not. Coniraya said that lots of cartoons that Lucas watched probably had the same accents and that Lucas might have just picked it up, but that that was why it was important to examine these things.

I brought up the Ewoks speaking Tagalog, knowledge courtesy of [livejournal.com profile] littlebutfierce ("Yes, let's make the little brown bears speak the language of the litle brown people!" she remarked there); Coniraya told people about the Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee casting news. The audience all groaned out loud, and Doselle Young put his head in his hands and said, "Excuse me. I need a moment to process." I can't remember if news of Brian Dennehy cast as GenghisKublai Khan came up here or not, though I suspect it did.

[livejournal.com profile] seaya mentioned the giant genre of "white teacher saves inner city kids," leading Coniraya to describe a Mad TV sketch featured "Nice Teacher Lady."

Janine asked us why we thought these "white man savior" movies were made by Hollywood. I think I took that opportunity to spout off my theory that the movies displayed the difference between institutional racism and personal prejudice; the heroes in the movies are ok in the end because they have conquered their personal prejudice, even if they have done absolutely nothing to combat racism as an institution. But the coda at the end about the Dire Situation served to make the (white) audience feel better for educating themselves on these issues.

Coniraya made the point that these movies clearly weren't being made for POC, which was racism in a whole 'nother sense. The filmmakers and writers were simply assuming that their audience was white.

I think I made a point about how even though the story of the white pilot in Shogun and the mixed-race protagonist of the Bury My Heart movie were both based on historical fact, someone (or many someones) made the decision to use that historical figure instead of focusing on non-white historical figures.

Someone in the audience mentioned mixed-race characters in media and how they're nearly always forced to act as a bridge between cultures or a translator or an interpreter. And then, of course, there was mention of the Tragic Mulatto trope. [livejournal.com profile] starkeymonster said something like, "Wouldn't it be nice if, for once, there were a mixed-race character who was just, you know, there? Having her own life? And not being tragic or conflicted?"

Coniraya also said that he lost respect for any actor or performer who was mixed race but claimed to be white, and only later admitted to being mixed race when it was politically savvy to do so.

We went back to the topic of interracial romances and how they always seemed to be between a white man and a woman of color; I can't remember if people mentioned that it was like colonialism in the miniature, but I suspect they did. Coniraya also mentioned that the black man never gets to have a romance with the white woman, citing Pelican Brief (the romance is in the book) and something that I forgot. I can't remember if the trope of the desexualized Asian man and the super-sexualized Asian woman came up, though I think it did, because I remember saying something about not being a geisha.

Someone asked if Denzel Washington specifically asked to be paired with other women of color; Coniraya said yes, but that Denzel was one of the few black actors who had the clout to do so.

There was also talk of the politics and financials of Hollywood, of how there are nearly no actors like Denzel who can draw in a white audience, and of how the system perpetuated itself. All the starring roles are given to white actors, so they become the ones people are familiar with, while actors of color get stuck with stereotyped roles. And, of course, the system went even further, so that most producers and writers and directors are white as well. Coniraya mentioned Pam Noles' post on white males still dominating Hollywood, surprise surprise.

I think I said something about how most of the movies have the person of color admiring the white protagonist for his character or his skill or something, and in general the panelists seemed to agree that the movies were a salve for white guilt -- get acknowledged for your efforts without having to give up any privilege.

Someone else brought up the fact that we were mostly talking about movies and TV (there was mention of the Buffyverse California and the Stargates); Doselle mentioned that for books, he wasn't as struck by it because it wasn't visual. I mentioned the Empire books by Feist and Wurts for mine (People! Asian culture is not all about ritual suicide!). I think this is when Coniraya talked about the Tamora Pierce books.

We never got around to talking about the Magical Negro as a possible complement to the Honky Savior trope, and I think the panel concluded with panelists saying that it would be so easy not to create a Honky Savior movie just by having POC as the main characters.

All in all, this was the panel I had the most fun at, and I think it went pretty well with the audience too. I do wish we were able to talk about more things in detail, but I think we hit a good number of topics. Also, the audience was great.

ETA: I forgot! Here's the link I told people about at the panel: "How to write about Africa."

ETA2: Attributed note of white teacher subgenre to [livejournal.com profile] seaya

ETA3: Fixed info on Brian Dennehy and added link.

[identity profile] yhlee.livejournal.com 2007-05-30 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
(People! Asian culture is not all about ritual suicide!)

WORD.

Someday after Bone & Chalice I will finish writing that space opera based on the Imjin War, and there will be NO RITUAL SUICIDES, just two Asian-based cultures cheerfully killing each other off.

[identity profile] yeloson.livejournal.com 2007-05-31 08:18 am (UTC)(link)
Right there with "asian people talk about honor then backstab each other" trope of played out bullshit. Gah.

OMG really

(Anonymous) 2008-09-09 04:29 am (UTC)(link)
I never noticed. That's crazy white folks shit. So obviously, it's some ploy for Whites to point the finger at other cultures and say, see, they did it too, regardless of veracity or context. I'll be watching for that one now.

[identity profile] yhlee.livejournal.com 2007-05-30 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Nobody brought up Robin McKinley's The Blue Sword? Huh.

[identity profile] tatterpunk.livejournal.com 2007-05-31 06:24 am (UTC)(link)
But (re: Blue Sword) does it count if it turns out she's a descendant of the culture she "saves," and this actually kept her from being completely happy in the colonizing/dominant culture?

[identity profile] tatterpunk.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 02:23 am (UTC)(link)
*nods* Makes sense.

Does Brotherhood of the Wolf have a place on this list? The community in trouble is part of the hero's own culture, but he's still an outsider in a sense... an outsider made more powerful by his disposable ethnic sidekick... hmm. *shrugs*

[identity profile] tatterpunk.livejournal.com 2007-06-05 03:00 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd recommend it -- not really the movie as a whole (don't want to spoil you), but it IS visually arresting... and I think it might be some interesting fodder for future discussions, considering the strange White Protagonist Assumes Ethnic Sidekick's Identity Ethnicity To Save Community subplot. Or it might just be more of the same old; it's been a long while since I saw it, and not with a critical eye.
seajules: (speak against racism)

[personal profile] seajules 2007-06-06 05:34 am (UTC)(link)
Well, it's Learned White Man of the World rescues Backcountry, Provincial Town, with the assistance of his Magical POC Sidekick. I'm not quite sure how it fits into the discussion, because the townspeople certainly exoticize Mani, but I'm not sure the narrative does. Though he's unquestionably only there to serve the ends of Fronsac, so while the movie really doesn't fit into the category of "White Savior to POC Society," it's not without other racially problematic tropes.

[identity profile] seitzk.livejournal.com 2007-07-19 04:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow. Wow. Have never brought any kind of race analysis to TBS - oh dear. And it was one of my favorite books...which says alot about what I accept rather uncritically.

[identity profile] sparkymonster.livejournal.com 2007-08-14 04:57 am (UTC)(link)
Totally belated here. Someone, I can't recall who, had mentioned "The Blue Sword" as example of a non-white protagonist. And...eh....

I think the book flips between two codings. Initialy Harry is perceived by the other colonists as having her blood "diluted" through the usual contamination by vague scary native people. She is not like the other people. And my initial quick re-reading was that she was sort of a lost mixed race person returning home. Home coming, who doesn't like that?

Then I did a re-read more closely (because I am a dork). And not so good.

In the first few chapters, in the colonialist society, Harry is clearly white. She is a Nice White Colonialist who likes the desert, isn't at home in constraining white society, blah blah. Then she meets actual natives, including the king of the good natives Corlath, and her life is omg changed forEVAR. Corlath's first view of her is basically she is the opposite of his people who are "small and dark of skin and hair." This, of course he finds hott. Harry also says to Corlath "I am not even of your Hills. Iw as born and bred far away--at Home. I have been here only a few months. I know nothing of this place." However, because she had a vision she must become the most perfect native EVER. And then she does. She not only becomes a king's rider in 6 weeks, she wins the super duper tournament *and* becomes the first lady-hero in forever. Interestingly, once Corlath decides he needs to make her go native, Harry starts referring to people by skin tone more. For instance, she has to learn how to mount her horse unassisted, and she laments the loss of the "brown man" who helps her mount her horse (she really does call him the "brown man", I'm not making that up).

As someone who has read far too many romance novels, I would link "Blue Sword" to the tradition of nubile white women being kidnapped by scary native men. The white woman kidnapped by the sheik (who is either half white, or educated in Europe and thus almost half white *eyeroll*). The sheik is of course over come by her exotic pure whiteness and must have her. The women in his harem (he always has one) are mean to the poor white lady because they realize they are totally ugly compared to her whiteness. Then, through the power of her whiteness, she teaches him life lessons about not being autocratic and then they fall in love and get married. Oh and suddenly sexism is abolished.

There are also the books where a Native American kidnaps the pure, exotic white woman to take her off to his tipi of oppression. The native women are totally mean to poor white lady, except for one who is super helpful. The helpful one either dies tragically, or gets to marry a relative of nice white lady. Somehow the native guy who kidnapped her turns out to either be half-white, or all white (apparently Native Americans kept on adopting the accidentally abandoned children of rich white people, being sure to keep track of a locket or ring that would prove the kid's whiteness and allow him access to his inheritence).

I think this FAQ entry from McKinley (http://www.robinmckinley.com/FAQ/FAQ03.html) makes it pretty clear that "Blue Sword" is in that genre of romance novels with the beige leader of brown people kidnapping the perfect white lady who fixes everything.

"I find Sword pretty embarrassing because my eleven-year-old self's fantasy of the perfect life is so nakedly exposed in it. (Corlath, by the way, looks a lot like Sean Connery from about twenty years ago, only with hair."

The leader of the short brown desert natives is...Scottish?! Awesomeness.

Sadly, this makes "Blue Sword" another book I need to turn off parts of my brain to enjoy re-reading. It meant alot to me when I first read it as a teen.

Hi super late comment, hi!

[identity profile] rilina.livejournal.com 2007-05-31 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
I think this one gets overlooked a lot because it's so beloved for having a girl who kicks ass. Which, yes, but feminism at the expense of anti-racism is not very satisfactory.
kate_nepveu: sleeping cat carved in brown wood (Default)

[personal profile] kate_nepveu 2007-05-31 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
Well, the savior does have a family connection to those being saved, and it does get better at the end, but yeah, I sort of feel guity for still liking that book on the basis of Harry and Corlath and training neep.

I think these stories exist because they sit at the intersection of two powerful story patterns, Fish Out of Water and Protagonist As Savior, and the force of their coming together seems so natural that unconscious racism and sexism doesn't get recognized.
kate_nepveu: sleeping cat carved in brown wood (Default)

[personal profile] kate_nepveu 2007-05-31 01:29 am (UTC)(link)
Yup. Just cause I see how these stories can come about doesn't mean that they aren't a problem.

Say, Pierce's Daughter of the Lioness books--I'll bet that Pierce wanted to write a book about Alanna's daughter, who kicks ass because all of her heroines kick ass, set someplace she hadn't written about yet, and about racial oppression.

All of the elements individually are fine . . . but when you put them together, you get the White Savior. Unintentionally, but there it is.

And for my own confession, I had other problems with the books that kept me from even *noticing* this until Mely pointed it out. (I vaguely wondered if Pierce was wholesale dropping in another culture as she'd already done with Japan, but mostly I was focused on the emotional dynamics.)

So: not easy to learn to step back and look at works in the context of society's racism, but necessary.

[identity profile] jinian.livejournal.com 2007-05-31 05:53 am (UTC)(link)
My brain is still going "but, but!" over The Blue Sword. :(

[identity profile] perkinwarbeck2.livejournal.com 2007-05-31 02:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Mine too. I really like that book! But I have to admit [livejournal.com profile] rilina has a point.

[identity profile] sparkymonster.livejournal.com 2007-05-31 11:58 am (UTC)(link)
I vaguely wondered if Pierce was wholesale dropping in another culture as she'd already done with Japan, but mostly I was focused on the emotional dynamics.)

In the Trickster books where 16 yr old white girl fixes the revolution the poor brown people were fcking up, Pierce explicity says the cultures she's basing things on.

It's so *headdesk* because I like Pierce's books a lot, I like that she is trying to leave the all white universe it's just...argh. She seems to have these blinders about racism and it is maddening.
kate_nepveu: sleeping cat carved in brown wood (Default)

[personal profile] kate_nepveu 2007-05-31 01:12 pm (UTC)(link)
The afterword to the second book mentions Alexander the Great & Egypt, William the Conqueror & England, American slavery, Tudor England during Edward VI and Elizabeth I, and "the history of any power that invades a country that is not its own and attempts to keep it."

Which is a bit of an odd mix, but perhaps suggests that the Copper Isles are more than just a country renamed, as Japan / Yamani Islands were.

[identity profile] sparkymonster.livejournal.com 2007-05-31 01:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I thought she mentioned in the first book being inspired by some island nations affected by colonialism. Tahiti maybe? The racial aspects of colonialism really struck me as being important in ways that her european examples don't have.

But yes, I agree that the Copper Isles are not the simple Japan => Yamani Islands thing.
kate_nepveu: sleeping cat carved in brown wood (Default)

[personal profile] kate_nepveu 2007-05-31 01:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Very possibly; I don't happen to have that at hand, but I'll check when I get home.
naomikritzer: (Default)

[personal profile] naomikritzer 2007-06-06 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
there are so few Fish Out of Water who are POC navigating white culture

I don't watch a lot of movies, but I can think of two -- problematic in their own ways. The first one that occurred to me is Coming to America -- I think that was the name of it, it starred Eddie Murphy and involved an African Prince moving to New York City. The other is The Gods Must Be Crazy. I don't recall either movie all that well, but in TGMBC, the protagonist is portrayed as utterly isolated from modern culture in a way that struck me as improbable when I watched it as a teenager. He's definitely a fish out of water, but he is utterly unable to cope with "civilization," and returns to his home as quickly as he can. In Coming to America, Eddie Murphy's character copes a bit better.

In a lot of the white-outside-among-the-natives stories, the white outsider's society is portrayed negatively, and the native society is idealized. Which means that simply reversing the trope can be just as offensive. Having refreshed my memory slightly by reading the LJ entry for Coming to America, it strikes me that they pull off that aspect of the trope as well. It probably helps that they make up the country that Eddie Murphy's character is from.
raanve: Tony Millionaire's Drinky Crow (Default)

[personal profile] raanve 2007-05-31 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
There was also talk of the politics and financials of Hollywood, of how there are nearly no actors like Denzel who can draw in a white audience, and of how the system perpetuated itself.

I can think of very few, and I am wracking my brain pretty hard. Denzel Washington, Will Smith, Samuel L Jackson. Those are the three big stars I can come up with. Don Cheadle has been getting really good press lately (for good reason), but I don't think he's of that same caliber, as far as box office clout.

I'm sorry I missed this one -- I think it was scheduled opposite another panel I really wanted to attend (X-Women panel? I can't remember).
raanve: Tony Millionaire's Drinky Crow (Default)

[personal profile] raanve 2007-05-31 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, and understandably so. The fact that I can't think of anyone else who has that kind of "star power" -- and yet I can probably rattle off a LONG list of white male actors -- just serves to illustrate the point.

And yet, when Crash won Best Picture, Hollywood was so self-congratulatory about "how it deals with race" that if you didn't know any better, you'd have believed that we'd finally gotten somewhere.

white programming guilt moment :)

[identity profile] pantryslut.livejournal.com 2007-05-31 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, thank God! That meand I didn't *actually* appoint the lone white person on the panel as the moderator, even by accident.

[identity profile] seaya.livejournal.com 2007-05-31 02:05 am (UTC)(link)
I was the one who mentioned the white teacher thing (and I'm a white teacher myself) heh.
sethg: picture of me with a fedora and a "PRESS: Daily Planet" card in the hat band (Default)

[personal profile] sethg 2010-06-06 02:07 am (UTC)(link)
Have you seen Dangerous Wands, the white-teacher-savior parody?
ext_3386: (fen of color)

[identity profile] vito-excalibur.livejournal.com 2007-05-31 02:40 am (UTC)(link)
Right, don't forget Dune. What the Universe needs is a honky.

[identity profile] tatterpunk.livejournal.com 2007-05-31 07:02 am (UTC)(link)
Do the Ewoks really speak Tagalog? Learn something every day...

I suppose not enough people know about the Ewok prequels/"sidequels" to talk about them in conjunction with Return of the Jedi, and whether Lucas comes out looking a little better, a lot worse, or just confused because of them.

[identity profile] tatterpunk.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
Yup, apparently they do! A woman in the audience mentioned they speak Swedish as well.

Hah! That's kind of stupidly awesome, as if Lucas like: well, can't be bothered to invent something new, but if I smoosh a bunch of languages together maybe no one will notice...

The wiki article also reports they speak Tibetan!

I alas don't know anything about the Star Wars books =(.

Neither do I, actually. These aren't books -- they were made-for-TV movies, directed and written by Lucas, with a story set pre-Jedi entirely on Endor. As a child of the eighties I happened to see those (well, the first one, The Ewok Adventure) before the trilogy, and was surprised at the reversal of portrayal -- the meat of the matter being in the TV movies, the Ewoks are shown as powerful and intelligent beings, not helped, by having to shepherd two outsiders (human) through their dangerous world. But I've since read a pretty scathing analysis of the films since, which highlight some, er, potential problems. I think I personally imprinted to early and too deeply (I was five, and I thought the Ewoks were hardcore. So young, and already such a loser.) on the first film to be unbiased, but it's interesting to hear other people's takes.

[identity profile] tatterpunk.livejournal.com 2007-06-03 12:36 pm (UTC)(link)
No problem! But just to state again: they're not books. (I've never read a Star Wars book, actually.) They were movies made after the trilogy.

[identity profile] perkinwarbeck2.livejournal.com 2007-05-31 02:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it's interesting to consider Shogun (1975) alongside The Left Hand of Darkness (1969). Both of them are explorations of "alien" societies, and both of them use the device of the visitor who is closer to the expected reader (I think it's as clear that Clavell, writing in English, wasn't writing for a Japanese audience as that Le Guin wasn't writing for a Gethenian one) who can be used as a pathway into the alien culture. They're both clearly in the tradition of the utopian novel where the present day explorer is washed up on the shore to make it easier for the reader to learn the culture along with the new arrival, rather than the immersive POV of a character from the society, like The Dispossessed or Memoirs of a Geisha. (Together for the very first time in a sentence!)

I think this articulates what is different for me about Shogun from the "need a honky" films. It's "start from the familiar and explore an exotic place" rather than "one white man is just what we need to save the world".

And this way you also get to see The Left Hand of Darkness in the context of colonialism... the most benign Hainish kind, naturally, but... is Genly Ai's visit to Gethen really going to lead to something better than those first contacts with Japan? Le Guin seems to have forgotten in later books the enemy out there that the Hainish wanted everyone to unite against -- is it going to end like William Tenn's "The Liberation of Earth"?
ext_6284: Estara Swanberg, made by Thao (Default)

[identity profile] estara.livejournal.com 2007-05-31 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I never thought of "visitor as translator for alien culture" as a POC-need-a-white-hero before... I guess that means C.J.Cherryh's Foreigner books are the same, although the guy IS literally the translator and not the Powers That Be. However they need his interpreting to survive the challenges put, so I guess it's a Aliens-need-human-hero after all.

Well I enjoy them anyway. She also addresses the problem of neutral interpretation and manipulation quite a lot in theh books.
(deleted comment)
ext_6284: Estara Swanberg, made by Thao (Default)

[identity profile] estara.livejournal.com 2009-12-19 06:25 pm (UTC)(link)
She did a couple of slavic interpretations, she'll be releasing them as ebooks on her coop-publishing venture with Jane Fancher and Lynn Abbey
http://www.closed-circle.net/WhereItsAt/?page_id=5

Just in case you want to refresh your memory ^^. I actually prefer her Foreigner universe to her fantasy, but it is interesting to be made aware of problematic tendencies which I haven't had the sensitivity for previously.

[identity profile] perkinwarbeck2.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 03:25 pm (UTC)(link)
But -- and I'm right back at cultural appropriation here, do you think though that it is worse for a random member of the dominant culture to know about pre-Tokugawa Japan only from Shogun or not to know anything about it at all?

I agree that ideally people would know about other cultures through their representations of themselves, but there's often a translation problem there, and also a "canon" problem, so one thing will become "the representative book of x" which also gives a distorted view, though not as distorted.

I really don't know what I think about this. I read Shogun when I was about twelve, and it definitely did affect my mental image of Japan, because before that it consisted of Hokusai's The Wave and atrocities in Burma in WW2. Shogun led me to reading some Japanese history, because I wanted to know what happened next. But I know there are a million things I've read where I haven't gone on any more, because I have only so much time and attention.

I'm rambling, but this whole thing reminds me of a very interesting radio interview with Salman Rushdie I heard once about Paul Scott's Jewel in the Crown series about the British in India and how Rushdie felt about the portrayal of Indians in the books. He thought the books were good about British people in India, but whenever they had an Indian point of view he'd be jerked out of the books because it was a lie, because it was part of a myth British people told themselves about Indian people, and there is no Hari Kumar. But even so I can see what Scott was trying to do there, and it was an anti-racist thing, he was trying to say if you could take an English boy and spray him brown and say he was an Indian, the treatment he would get as one would be awful and unfair and therefore treating Indians like that also isn't very nice, hello? (It's something SF could do better, now I think of it.) And I don't see how Scott could have said that without Hari Kumar. And then Rushdie went on to say pretty much exactly what I'd been thinking, and he said that this is a message to the British readers, OK, they might need their hands held through this, but what about the Indian readers? And I think this is a place he's clearly done a lot of writing from, particularly in Midnight's Children, which after that interview I've always seen as being in dialogue with Scott's books. So maybe sometimes something real comes out of the cultural appropriation like flowers from manure?
chomiji: Cartoon of chomiji in the style of the Powerpuff Girls (Default)

[personal profile] chomiji 2007-05-31 02:47 pm (UTC)(link)


Re your comment on "the trope of the desexualized Asian man": a recent article from the Washington Post may be of interest:



'Slanted Screen' Rues the Absence of Asians



It's a review of a show, "The Slanted Screen: Asian Men in Film and Television," that ran on public television last week (hmmm ... and here's a website for the show as well).




ext_6284: Estara Swanberg, made by Thao (Default)

Please clarify

[identity profile] estara.livejournal.com 2007-05-31 08:02 pm (UTC)(link)
"The Man Who Would Be King (identified as a take on the trope),"

Sorry but I don't understand what you meant in the brackets, could you clarify?

And where is the white protagonist that runs the show in the Empire books? I thought the main person was the female Tsurani (of course she got help from her Midkemian slave AND from the queen of another species) and she kept within her society while changing the rules somewhat.

Or is the point here that Feist and Wurts aren't POC?

I'm half Arabian myself, but raised German, so I can't really say I can comment with any POC knowledge (particulary since I look like my German mother and never had the problems my brother had).
seajules: (water woman)

Re: Please clarify

[personal profile] seajules 2007-06-01 06:05 am (UTC)(link)
Huh. The white guys in The Man Who Would Be King don't kill each other, but they do fuck everything up, partly by one of them trying to pass himself off as the Great White Savior. It's been a few years since I saw it, but I seem to recall some pretty interesting reversals of tropes along the way, including one featuring the sexy native woman to whom the would-be Great White Savior takes a liking. Of course, if I'm remembering correctly, there might have been other twists that weren't as cool. I don't know, should I worry about spoilers for a movie that old?

I haven't read the Empire books, but I remember [livejournal.com profile] rilina's comment on The Blue Sword, and my gut reaction of, "But! But! Harry kicks ass! Nooo!" Yet, she's right, that book is very problematic with regards to race.

There actually are stories that feature a POC protagonist as a Fish Out of Water in white culture. Unfortunately, they're usually of the Noble Tragic Savage variety. Not encouraging.

I do have to wonder if the way The Matrix movies ended up puts them in the White Savior category. Yes, Will Smith was the first choice for Neo, but he's not who ended up on the screen. Yes, Keanu Reeves is mixed-race, but the character was significantly lighter than most of the denizens of Zion, and the casting of his friends/co-workers within the frame of the Matrix was predominantly white (as was his love interest, which could have been very interesting if Neo had been played as a POC, but only seemed to reinforce his whiteness in the final result). I could be way off, but it's something I wondered about when we first got a glimpse of Zion, as I wondered why the Wachowski Brothers didn't approach, say, Keith Hamilton Cobb or Malcolm Jamal Warner or Cuba Gooding Jr. to play Neo when Will Smith turned them down. These are familiar names to sf fans, not to mention handsome, physically fit actors who would have done admirably as humanity's saviors. Or heck, cast Dustin Nguyen, though he certainly blows the idea of the non-sexual Asian male out of the water. Granted, all four actors I've mentioned don't have the clout of Will Smith or Keanu Reeves, and I did like the Bill & Ted jokes that made it into the movies because of the casting of Keanu Reeves. Still, I could cope with the lack of jokes for any of those four on the big screen, and for the movies that could have resulted from such "daring" casting (both because the actors are relative unknowns in Hollywood at large and because they're POC).

But possibly all of that's an aside.

I so wanted to attend Wiscon this year. Maybe next year.

Oh! Thunderheart might count in the way Bury My Heart does. Val Kilmer plays a mixed-race federal agent in that one, investigating a murder on a reservation. I'm trying to remember if the final showdown was his idea or not.
ext_6284: Estara Swanberg, made by Thao (Default)

Re: Please clarify

[identity profile] estara.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 07:55 am (UTC)(link)
but I remember rilina's comment on The Blue Sword, and my gut reaction of, "But! But! Harry kicks ass! Nooo!" Yet, she's right, that book is very problematic with regards to race.

At least she also wrote The Hero and the Crown within that society AND with a world-saving heroine who shows the patriarchy what's what AND has TWO true loves. Not too shabby, I think.
ext_6284: Estara Swanberg, made by Thao (Default)

Re: Please clarify

[identity profile] estara.livejournal.com 2007-06-02 09:11 pm (UTC)(link)
well geographically both are Damar, just several hundreds/thousands ? of years apart and the heroine of the Blue Sword even sees Aerin in some campfire and meets Lute, as far as I remember. .. ought to reread sometime soon

Re: Please clarify

[identity profile] rilina.livejournal.com 2007-06-02 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
The Hero and the Crown is also problematic because Aerin is coded as being different racially from the people she saves; she's described as being red-haired and green-eyed and thus different. It's still a honky story, if perhaps marginally less problematic than The Blue Sword.

Re: Please clarify

[identity profile] mkcs.livejournal.com 2007-07-07 04:28 am (UTC)(link)
I saw it as much more problematic, in that sense, than 'The Blue Sword'.

In 'The Blue Sword', the situation is a thinly camoflagued version of the British Raj. The racism of the British in the situation is acknowledged to at least some degree, and the 'Afghans' in the hills are allowed to be educated and intelligent, as well as being exotic to the British-born heroine.

And the mystical powers that the heroine develops turn out to be because she's part-Afghan, not because she's a foreigner. Furthermore, it's 'white woman and mixed group of native tribes and white men save white and native kingdoms from evil demons'. It's not as though the Afghans have no agency.

In 'The Hero and the Crown', the mystical powers seem to correlate worryingly closely with how white one's skin is. Aerin's family originally came from the North, and they have some power. Aerin's mother came from the North more recently, so she's a white-skinned red-head and she and her family members have much more power. The wizard, Luthe, has much more power than her family again, and he's even whiter than her, and blond.

Aerin and Luthe save Damar without Damar even being aware of the fact.

I was surprised, reading this thread, to find people who'd read Aerin's family as 'coded white', when there is explicit discussion of the skin colours in the book, although I suppose if one read it before 'The Blue Sword' and one skipped over a few passages, one might very well miss it.

Re: Please clarify

[identity profile] mkcs.livejournal.com 2007-07-10 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
Having thought a bit further, I think one can actually make at least a reasonable argument for Aerin's not being coded white. It depends on the viewpoint of the reader, partly.

After all, in her country, she's one of a minority ethnic group that the majority see as 'savage' (uncivilised Northerners) and possibly mystical. Her dragon-killing is definitely interpreted as an expression of this by the courtiers. She's certainly discriminated against for not being of the majority ethnicity (and I did read her final acceptance of not being monarch in her own right as being a race issue, not a sex-role issue, mainly).

One could argue that this is intended to work like 'A Wizard of Earthsea', which uses brown=normal and white=savage to make a point about the overwhelming 'whiteness' of fantasy while also providing a good fantasy novel with a hero of colour.

The difference is in the viewpoint character, of course. Aerin is definitely white-skinned.

I didn't read the culture as Eurofantasy-esque, but I don't know how much of that is because I read 'The Blue Sword' first, so I saw it as very much set somewhere like Afghanistan. I'll have to read it again to see what's there.

(Are you seeing Aerin and her family as the same ethnicity? That definitely confuses me. So much of her situation hinges on her obvious physical differences from her family -- most of which are to do with colour, although height is also an issue. So if the culture is Eurofantasy, her mother can't be, but if the culture isn't, her mother, by implication, must be.)

I do think 'The Blue Sword' has a lot of very clear rejection of colonialism in it. It's easy to find bits of colonialism in it, because it is set against a colonial background, but it's got a lot of explicit statements that the colonial attitude towards other countries is demeaning for all parties, as well as the implicit anti-colonial messages that attach to having the indigenous culture succeed in preserving its independence. It is also unusual for a racist work to end in a set of mixed marriages and the establishment of formal diplomatic relations between countries.

Some of McKinley's other work suggests that one can also view the colonialism of the England-equivalent (the one that Harry thinks of only as 'Home') as normal behaviour for any country at a certain stage. Certainly, Damar used to be a great land that filled most of the continent south of the hill country -- but other stories set in different bits of this fantasy world's history ('Deerskin', 'The Healer', and 'The Stagman'), as well as bits of 'The Blue Sword', make it clear that the continent in question has been divided into many kingdoms on many occasions, and so Damar's claim to have owned all of it seems likely to have been through conquest and colonisation too.

Thanks for this discussion, incidentally. It's been really good for making me think about aspects of these books that I'd noticed, but never really focused on.

Re: Please clarify

(Anonymous) 2007-07-11 07:03 pm (UTC)(link)
There can be a huge difference between what the author intends and what they actually end up writing.

And I think this is it, here.

Harry's mixed blood does mix things up there, a bit, but really not much.

Re: Please clarify

[identity profile] daedala.livejournal.com 2007-06-09 01:29 am (UTC)(link)
I think it might matter which book you read first, maybe. I read The Hero and the Crown first, and I agree that the society codes as white. White white white. The red hair was just the usual red-haired Mary Sue thing (not that I thought so at the time) really well-done.

When I read The Blue Sword, I thought it was weird how turning the land into the desert lead the people to take up a Middle-Eastern nomadic type lifestyle, but didn't actually perceive them as nonwhite, because Damar had already been coded in my head as Generic European Fantasy. Nomadism is practical in a desert, so they got tanned. I didn't imprint on TBS the way I did on THATC; the latter is one of my favorite comfort reads of all time. I've read THATC a million zillion times. I liked TBS okay.....

Since The Blue Sword was actually written first, I absolutely agree that they're both racially problematic. It's just that reading them in the direction I did, I thought they were problematic only in the absence of colored characters, and I tend to give that a pass (is that fair?) in fantasies without mass transit.

I don't know if this says more about me or the books. It seems a weird enough perspective to be worth mentioning.

Re: Please clarify

[identity profile] daedala.livejournal.com 2007-06-11 05:37 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think I would have realized it was so directly related if I hadn't already known it was a sequel. I probably would have figured "same fictional world, around the same area, my don't stories change over time."

Throwing in the pseudo-Raj just seemed sooooooo weird. That's part of the reason I never bonded with the story. Despite Harry usually being my kinda Mary Sue.

Also, I am usually weirded out by the "white woman kidnapped by savage" type stories, and not usually into the "white woman is matched with exotic savage" type stories. It's a romance subgenre that leaves me cold. Exoticization is not romantic. I like some stories of that type that get around the exoticization somehow.

One aspect of cultural appropriation is the one where you represent a culture you don't understand, and your heroes are those whose values are closest to yours (no matter how far they are from the values of the culture in question). Like how romance heroines are always feminists.

Re: Please clarify

[identity profile] daedala.livejournal.com 2007-06-12 02:25 am (UTC)(link)
Or the protagonist in a story depicting gay culture happens to be the only monogamous gay character. Or the good characters in a novel about India are all anti-suttee, and the bad characters are all pro-suttee. Hell, even the stories where bad characters are allergic to the good characters' cats annoy me.

It's not so much that I object to all romance heroines being feminists; it's that I object to them being 20th century feminists rather than 19th century feminists (or 16th century, or whatever). I can see that it might be hard to identify with someone who was antifeminist, enough to write the character, even. But I really like the thought process for being feminist, or abolitionist, or whatever in the context of the time and culture; I don't like time-travel stories without a time-traveler.

I would be interested in any romance recs that you felt dealt with race well. I've been racking my brain and not thinking of any, but that's probably because I'm trying to think of them. Elizabeth Grayson's So Wide the Sky was good; the hero is half-Indian, and the heroine is a white captive (in a comparatively unromanticized treatment) who is returned to the whites and is unable to fit in. I have a guilty fondness for Chase's The Sandalwood Princess, but it's terrible on race -- Magical Negro Indian, sexualized Indian Princess, etc. I liked it for the other tropes.
seajules: (speak against racism)

Re: Please clarify

[personal profile] seajules 2007-06-04 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
The thing is, the culture of Damar in that book is written as rather medieval European. Even if you read it as medieval India, there's still the issue of Aerin being "whiter" than her countrymen, with her mother coded as a Russian-equivalent. So she's great from a feminist perspective, as is Harry, but still problematic racially.
ext_6284: Estara Swanberg, made by Thao (Default)

Re: Please clarify

[identity profile] estara.livejournal.com 2007-06-05 07:34 pm (UTC)(link)
interesting viewpoint. I always read Damar as Arabic, a mixture of 1001 nights Baghdad and nomadic tribe culture (except for the farm population). I definitely did see the Imperial British analogue for Harry's home country *nod*.

So for me the emphasis on Aerin as a girl (and sole surviving child of the ruler) in a patriarchy far outweighed the racial connotations. I don't even remember them ^^, but I haven't reread that book in two or three years, I'm sure.
seajules: (speak against racism)

Re: Please clarify

[personal profile] seajules 2007-06-06 05:41 am (UTC)(link)
I can see the Arabic-coding. Either way, though, there's the problem of Harry and Aerin both being "whiter" than the civilization(s) they're "saving."

As I said, I liked Harry and Aerin as feminist icons (though I feel compelled to point out that Aerin does pass on the crown, and I believe allows whatshisname to take credit for killing the dragon, so the patriarchy still ends up preserved that way). Their cool factor as such, however, doesn't negate the racial issues.
seajules: (speak against racism)

Re: Please clarify

[personal profile] seajules 2007-06-06 05:25 am (UTC)(link)
I think you're right about one reason for the "color-coding," as it were, but there's a bit of an unfortunate side effect that feeds back into the idea that light-skinned people don't have ethnicities and people of color are "more in touch with nature" because they're more in touch with their savage natures. You've even got Trinity the White Girl Raised by Natives, as it were, along with Morpheus the Magical Negro. I would love to have seen that character played less, "I believe in you! You are the One!" and more, "I'm invested in you because I might be able to train you to save mankind, but you're not the only candidate, and I will drop you if you don't work out." It would have made more sense, I think.

One thing that struck me when watching the movies was a comment Neo makes about a place that serves "really good noodles," and we see business signs in...I want to say a form of Chinese characters, though I could be misremembering. So it would have made sense to surround Neo with Asian friends and co-workers, which would have reinforced the Asian part of the actor's heritage, and coded the character differently. Such a choice would have run a risk with the stereotype of "emotionless, sheep-like, and all technologically gifted," but I think having Neo's club friends also be Asian would have offset that. The casting of Keanu could have pushed some boundaries that it ended up...not. It was the "part-white" that was emphasized, and I love the first movie (and parts of the second and third), but I can't help imagining how much more they could have been.

One of these years, I'll make it. I just have to plan seriously in advance, and probably have a fair chunk of change to put into it, since I'm not a good candidate for a roommate for even one person. Feh.
seajules: (speak against racism)

Re: Please clarify

[personal profile] seajules 2007-06-09 07:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I hadn't thought of Trinity in that light until reading your notes on the panel, so I'm learning new ways to look at media. I consider this a good thing.

I'd love to have seen some of that mixing, actually. I mean, there were white background characters in Zion, too, but I think the only Asian characters we saw were within the Matrix. Really, it's The Animatrix, specifically "Final Flight of the Osiris," that got me thinking about what the movies could have been with regards to diversity in casting. I mean, consider if Morpheus and Neo had been reversed.

You should come down to San Diego! I'd feed you!
ext_6284: Estara Swanberg, made by Thao (Default)

Re: Please clarify

[identity profile] estara.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 07:50 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, thank you for clearing that up.

TMWWBK does end in catastrophe, true, but most of the time these guys are out to run the show in that "primitive" society, until one of them believes his own hype. The end failure is spectacular.

[identity profile] fourthage.livejournal.com 2007-05-31 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you for the write-up! Someday I am going to go to Wiscon and hear all of these interesting panels in person.

[identity profile] ide-cyan.livejournal.com 2007-06-02 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
Added this to [livejournal.com profile] whileaway's memories!

[identity profile] apostle-of-eris.livejournal.com 2007-06-02 09:40 am (UTC)(link)
I didn't see it, but wasn‘nt "Mississippi Burning" a movie about the Civil Rights Movement about a couple of white guys?

A little nit-pickingky:
"The Magnificent Seven" was a remake of the Japanese "Seven Samurai", so there are complications, and making the peasants Mexican to make them as destitute as possible could be artistically defensible.
"Seven Years in Tibet" was watered down a lot (since the book was!), but it shows a teenaged avatar in one of the most remote and "backward" places on earth making a Nazi into a human being just with his presence.
And "The King and I" and "Anna and the King" are about one of the most spectacularly successful reverse-exploitations in history. Of all the earth, Thailand was never a European colony!! The education of King Chulalongkorn clearly was an outstanding success.

ext_6428: (Default)

[identity profile] coffeeandink.livejournal.com 2007-06-03 02:51 pm (UTC)(link)
That is a sadly accurate description of Mississippi Burning.

I'm confused about why you think Anna and the King/The King and I are reverse exploitation: can you clarify? I am not familiar with the original book, but the musical strikes me as making use of a lot of racist tropes about hidebound Asians, free-spirited Westerners, and doomed tragic Asian romances. Thailand's situation doesn't seem to be quite as straightforward to me as you make out: It may never have been a direct European colony, but a lot of its economy depends on and is limited by Western exploitation.

[identity profile] apostle-of-eris.livejournal.com 2007-06-03 04:08 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess I'm conflating the movies and the history . . .
In the mid-Nineteenth Century, the king of Thailand saw clearly which way the wind was blowing, and decided that his heir needed all the Western knowledge he could get. So the king hired an English tutor for his children. (IIRC, this is the king who offered to send President Lincoln some war elephants to help with the Civil War.)
Along with other political and educational measures, it worked spectacularly: Thailand was never owned by a European power. The entire Western Hemisphere was. The entire continent of Africa was. Most of Asia was owned or utterly controlled (c.f., Opium Wars). But Thailand was never formally owned or controlled.
I'm dumbfounded. To this day, Thailand has the best king in the world. It is a constitutional monarchy, but the king is held in such regard that some years ago when there was a very severe sequence of escalating riots, he summoned the commander in chief of the army and the leader of the opposition to an audience together, and told them, "this must stop," . . . and it did.

The schoolteacher's memoirs, which are very interesting, have been made into a series of movies. The first kept in a variety of unhappy and/or ugly sequences of events.
The musical t/r/e/a/c/l/e/ version used Thailand mostly for "color" (in the prismatic, not racial sense!). And I probably haven't seen the most recent, though I assume it's no better.

DISCLAIMER: A lot of this is written in shorthand which can be seen as problematic. Please don't conflate idiomatic brevity with ignorance or malice.
ext_6385: (Default)

[identity profile] shewhohashope.livejournal.com 2007-06-05 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
Ethiopia was never colonised, to my knowledge.

[identity profile] darkrosetiger.livejournal.com 2007-06-27 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
The interesting thing about the original stage version of The King and I is that it includes a song that was cut from the movie and is usually cut from stage productions: "Western People Funny" (http://www.stlyrics.com/lyrics/thekingandi/westernpeoplefunny.htm). The song's written in an unfortunate pidgin-English, but lyrics like:

They think they civilise us Ah.....
Whenever they advise us
To learn to make the same mistake
That they are making too!

...are rather pointed for Broadway in 1951. The fact that the song was cut from the movie is an interesting contrast with West Side Story, where "America" is much sharper in the film than onstage.

/theatergeek
ext_6385: (Default)

[identity profile] shewhohashope.livejournal.com 2007-06-02 04:57 pm (UTC)(link)
"And don't forget, the white guy always gets the sexy native girl! Or a white girl who has been raised native," said one of the panelists.

It's interesting that this is the opposite of romance novels, which always seem to have an 'exotic' male lead rather than a 'native' girl. I suppose that the reader of the romance novel is implicitly female (and white), whereas the audience for the white (male) saviour genre is male (and white).

I'm enjoying these posts so much that I might try to go to WisCon 32, even though I'm not sure exactly where Wisconsin is.

[identity profile] apostle-of-eris.livejournal.com 2007-06-03 04:18 pm (UTC)(link)
WisCon - “The World's Leading Feminist Science Fiction Convention” (http://www.wiscon.info/) is in Madison, Wisconsin (state capitol and university town), on "Memorial Day weekend" (the last weekend in May.
It's a 3-hour bus ride (http://www.coachusa.com/vangalder/?404;http://www.vangalderbus.com:80/vgschedule.html) from Chicago O'Hare International Airport - ORD (http://www.chicago-ord.com/index.html).
ext_6385: (Default)

[identity profile] shewhohashope.livejournal.com 2007-06-03 06:11 pm (UTC)(link)
THREE HOURS.

Yes, it's that, rather than the flight from London to Chicago I find off-putting.

[identity profile] apostle-of-eris.livejournal.com 2007-06-03 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
It's a comfortable bus, though it does go to the student union and you have to walk back up State St. to the con hotel (a very pleasant walk, but my luggage backpacks . . .)
That's the worst-case scenario, however. There is quite a bit of fannish traffic, and a very reasonable chance of connecting with a ride.

[identity profile] minnow1212.livejournal.com 2007-06-04 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
That's a really neat point.

Though--and I haven't been reading romances regularly lately, so this may be out of date--that also made me realize anew that only certain types of exoticism are "okay." That is, I remember seeing oh-so-many books with white women/Native American protagonists, and some with white women/Hispanic men, and one with a white woman/male lead who was mixed race Asian/white, but offhand I can't remember any where the male lead was (a) black (b) Asian.

Which maybe has something to do with the story trajectory as well. For white men in the honky savior storyline, part of their journey is that they need to become a member (as well as a savior) of the "native" group, right? They're accepted, unlike most white folks, because they're so cool and awesome. So the consummation of the romance acts as a final stamp of approval, a final welcoming into the tribe--a welcome literally embodied in the woman they hook up with.

(Huh--I don't know a lot of these sources, and I wonder if there's any pattern in terms of whether the white man gets the native girl vs. the raised-by-natives girl--whether certain types of interracial relationships are more acceptable.)

With romances: do you get as much of the white woman entering a native culture? My impression is that mostly the exoticism comes to her, at least in contemporaries? So it's more the lure of the exotic (the wild) without the actual difficulties of being an outsider in another culture? But I don't read a lot of historicals, where you seem to have a lot of the white woman/Native American man pairing, at least based on covers, so I could be wrong.
ext_6385: (Default)

[identity profile] shewhohashope.livejournal.com 2007-06-04 11:51 am (UTC)(link)
This entry (http://oyceter.livejournal.com/579513.html) goes into which ethnicities are different enough to be exotic, but not dark enough to be threatening. Basically, 'Spanish', 'Greek' or 'Sheikh' (I don't think romance writers know what this word means. Or they're using it exclusively to mean 'man of stature'. I suppose 'old man' or 'Islamic scholar' isn't really as sexy as 'foreign prince'). And American novels have a native American/First Nations thing going too, although they insist on using the word 'Savage' in the title.

This is why, when I'm in a bookshop and pause to laugh at the titles of the romance novels, I never go so far as to buy one to see what's actually inside. In fact, this is why I don't even look at romance novels anymore. It's okay to laugh once or twice, but if I look at it for too long, it just makes me angry.

[identity profile] minnow1212.livejournal.com 2007-06-04 02:48 pm (UTC)(link)
>I suppose 'old man' or 'Islamic scholar' isn't really as sexy as 'foreign prince'<

:snerk:
octopedingenue: (jin postmodern)

[personal profile] octopedingenue 2007-06-03 09:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Recent Denzel Washington flick Deja Vu is a terrible horrible no good very bad movie: still, it is interesting that the female lead/Denzel's love interest is explicitly mixed-race (her white father has a speaking role) but as she hangs out living her life she isn't particularly more conflicted in her life than another action movie damsel-in-distress. Which doesn't make other aspects of the movie less headdesky in terms of race, gender, economics, logic, and the laws of physics.

Will Smith could be interesting in I Am Legend (in the book, last non-vampirified man becomes The Other by being normal human) and Tonight, He Comes (black superhero in interracial relationship with white lover played by South African actress) if either movie is not the suck.

Is Morgan Freeman as God in Bruce/Evan Almighty an extension of the Magical Negro, a twist on it, and/or something else?

(Anonymous) 2009-10-29 06:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Is Morgan Freeman as God in Bruce/Evan Almighty an extension of the Magical Negro, a twist on it, and/or something else?

I suppose it could be argued that this is an extension of Magical Negro, but only if you view the movie in an extremely limited way.

Consider that most representations of the Christian God and Jesus are represented by blue-eyed, pale skinned white people. Also consider that the story of Jesus takes place in an area where he could not have been a blue-eyed white person.

As a POC and a Christian, I sat through Bruce Almighty just damn glad to see something besides the Blue-Eyed Savior. For that reason, I really don't think it qualifies as "Magical Negro" at all.

[identity profile] safrialailo.livejournal.com 2007-06-04 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
I get most of these and I'm definately agains the trope,(even though I LIKED the constant gardener as a book due to recent discussions with friends from other races i've had it pointed out to me how problematic it is and gone "doh".) but I just have to ask. How does lost in translation fit?

Cos to me that movies, all about people feeling lost in other cultures, sure they could have done it with PoC in a country not their own but surely that's just the more general thin of whites dominating hollywood. I don't really see him as saving anything at all,just desperately trying to find himself?

So yeah just wondering how you saw that as fitting in. Thanks for an incredibly interesting article.

[identity profile] meatwhichdreams.livejournal.com 2007-09-10 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
I had the same question as t'other fellow. I think the thing you can argue about Lost In Translation though is that it's actually going for that angle...I mean, I saw it as a quiet underlying commentary on how self-absorbed we Americans even as we're trying to be introspective. I mean, here these people are, in a whole wide exiting, exotic country half-way across the world from their home, and what can they think about? Themselves. Maybe it's just my wishful thinking that the movie's going for that wry angle, but, hey, that's part of what I think it went for.

Oh, and marvelous post! I couldn't agree with you more.

[identity profile] morchades.livejournal.com 2007-06-04 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
I think I said something about how most of the movies have the person of color admiring the white protagonist for his character or his skill or something, and in general the panelists seemed to agree that the movies were a salve for white guilt -- get acknowledged for your efforts without having to give up any privilege.

I can't be the only one thinking of John Stewart in Green Lantern: Rebirth.

(Of course, its possible I'm the only one to read both that and this report.)

[identity profile] morchades.livejournal.com 2007-06-09 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
Well, Rebirth basically is about fixing a story where Hal Jordan, the old 60s Green Lantern, went evil and tried to restart the Universe (they blamed it on possession by a giant bugmonster from outer space, I love comic books).

Up until this story, Hal and John had had an interesting relationship. John's attitude from the beginning (WAY back in Green Lantern/Green Arrow #87 in 1972) was that Hal was a decent guy and a good lantern, but not as good as he thinks he is or as smart as he thinks he is. There was more conflict than fawning, though.

In Rebirth, John suddenly shows a weird intense loyalty to Hal that he never really did before. There is an awesome scene where he tells off Batman for trashing Hal, but prior to that he's describing Hal as the "Best" and just plain reverent in way he hadn't been before.

Its annoying, because this same writer managed to put some of intensity back into John's character (he was pretty much shoved to the background for about a decade up until this), but his relationship with Hal was one of mutual respect and friendship, not hero worship. The other two Lanterns it makes sense for, but John should know better given their history.

I'm not sure if this was corrected later or not, because so far John's only appeared in a couple of issues of Green Lantern since, and I missed one of them (there's a big special out this month that should give him at least one "spotlight" moment.)

[identity profile] heavenscalyx.livejournal.com 2007-06-06 06:07 pm (UTC)(link)
It was a fabulous and fun panel, and it's the first panel my wife and I mention to our friends when going on about the joys of WisCon. :) The add-on of "The Kingdom of Heaven" has allowed my wife to revise her summary of the trope to "Last of the Samurai Dancing With Wolves in Heaven."

I was going to mention at one point, but then forgot, the granddaddy of the Honky Savior stories, The Last of the Mohicans.

[identity profile] heavenscalyx.livejournal.com 2007-06-07 01:44 pm (UTC)(link)
It ain't worth it, unless you're into Daniel Day Lewis eye candy. It came out in the theaters while I was working in one eons ago, so I got to see most of it, though slightly out of order. :}
alias_sqbr: the symbol pi on a pretty background (Default)

[personal profile] alias_sqbr 2007-07-10 11:34 am (UTC)(link)
Hi, I came accross this post (possibly indirectly) via metafandom. Anyway, I'm feeling rather unwell so this may be a totally dumb comment, but talking about "Lost in Translation" made me think of an australian film which came out around the same time, Japanese story. A Japanese man comes to australia on business and has a clash of cultures romance with the australian geologist assigned to him. It's a bit Australia=big empty country full of lovable larrikins, Japan=uptight cities full of business people (as an indoorsy urban australian who knows lots of freewheeling asians this rubbed me slightly the wrong way) but still breaks sterotypes a bit and is a sweet story. Unless there were just different stereotypes and I didn't notice :)

Also, I personally think "Lost in Translation" is ok since it doesn't pretend to be about Japan, it's about the alienation of being overseas and how desperate you get for a taste of home. Telling this story did mean having to make the Japanese characters alienating and strange but I at least got the feeling that this was in no way meant to be a reflection on what Japan is really like if you have a chance to get to know it (which the main characters didn't) But YMMV
alias_sqbr: the symbol pi on a pretty background (Default)

[personal profile] alias_sqbr 2007-07-24 04:51 am (UTC)(link)
Well, keep in mind that I'm not Japanese and wasn't paying extraspecially close attention to the race issues, so I can't guarantee it's all that progressive. Also, while the film does show his experiences I would say that the white australian character is more the protagonist.

Wait, so does mean

[identity profile] 410-gone.livejournal.com 2007-07-27 05:17 am (UTC)(link)
That there can't be any film adaptations of these historical events/personages?

The Barbary Wars- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_War

John Rabe (as well as Minnie Vautrin and John Magee)- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Rabe

Re: Wait, so does mean

[identity profile] 410-gone.livejournal.com 2007-08-04 05:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you for not answering a single question, and attacking someone who was asking questions without even making a statement!

Re: Wait, so does mean

[identity profile] 410-gone.livejournal.com 2007-08-05 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
Well, I wasn't trying to quash nuthin', so that's that, I suppose.

Re: Wait, so does mean

[identity profile] 410-gone.livejournal.com 2007-08-05 03:23 am (UTC)(link)
Still, a film about John Rabe would make some mighty Oscar material/emotional tearjerker/spark of Sino-Japanese hostility.

[identity profile] teenygozer.livejournal.com 2008-05-24 03:54 am (UTC)(link)
Sounds like a fascinating panel! I immediately thought of Kung Fu, starring David Carradine instead of Bruce Lee, who was initially meant to star in it.

You might want to check out the very excellent animated show Avatar: The Last Airbender -- it's one of those shows that starts out for children, but it's so good that in the end, half the audience turns out to be adults. Every single character in it is Asian. M. Night Shymalian is doing a live-action movie version of the show and, though there's no word on the casting yet, I find myself afraid that it's going to be re-cast with Caucasian actors.

ooo, yes!

(Anonymous) 2008-09-09 04:26 am (UTC)(link)
"I think I said something about how most of the movies have the person of color admiring the white protagonist for his character or his skill or something"

Even when it's shit they TAUGHT the white man! e.g. The Last Samurai

Is the Magical Negro an extension of the Mammy (the self-sacrificing source of boundless spiritual --which usually means any idea that's not inspired by the industrial revolution or the Crusades-- wisdom, but who would have thought) or do you mean like "all you people know voodoo, right?" magical?

And, one for the list: Blood Diamond.
This one is unique from the others in that it criticizes one White Savior charatcer, but still exhonerates another, has that character compare a black man to a baboon and threaten to skin him (he does skin the baboon and for no reason, but that's another blog), and all without the director noticing that all of it might be offensive. Seriously: rent it and turn on the commentary. But then he is still the guy did Last Samurai. Enjoy!
tablesaw: -- (Default)

[personal profile] tablesaw 2008-12-14 07:56 pm (UTC)(link)
reginagiraffe: Stick figure of me with long wavy hair and giraffe on shirt. (Default)

[personal profile] reginagiraffe 2009-05-28 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
Just found this via [livejournal.com profile] zvi_likes_tv.

White guy fights for natives. White guy makes dramatic escape while the native guy dies, possibly trying to help the white guy.

You could add Ironman to this list, too.


(Sorry for the edits! I thought I was on Dreamwidth. Duh.)
Edited 2009-05-28 01:29 (UTC)

Parody

(Anonymous) 2009-10-03 07:56 pm (UTC)(link)
I remember a long ago skit from MadTv about this South African white woman during Apartheid who "cried and wept" and wrote strongly worded letters to the local newspaper at the inconvenience of losing her black maid. (As the country went to hell all around her and she couldn't clean her home or fix her own meals.)
I think this was a direct parody of Out Of Africa, which even tho' it is set in Africa has sidelined all of the African people in it to little more than local color.
There's a whole host of these films where the story is supposed to be about the major events of that time and place but all of the natives barely have lines in the movie and are sometimes entirely absent. The only way you would know where the characters are and what's going on is because the white (usually British or American) characters are discussing it.
I blame those darn Tarzan movies.

Page 1 of 2