oyceter: teruterubouzu default icon (daniel)
Oyceter ([personal profile] oyceter) wrote2003-12-29 01:40 am
Entry tags:

Peter Pan

Ha, got to see Peter Pan today (saw Cold Mountain yesterday because the theater we were going to watch Peter Pan at had an electricity outage!). I liked it, but with a few reservations.

The bad first: Jeremy Sumpter was, er, not my Peter Pan. Actually, he felt kind of like Jake Lloyd in Phantom Menace, a little too rote or something. I don't know what it was, but the bits of magic in the movie fell flat when he spoke. I also thought the movie relied a leeetle too much on special effects in a way that Peter Jackson managed to miraculously avoid in LotR. Some shots didn't work for me, like the one with them flying past the planets. I also got a little annoyed with Tinkerbell's slightly too obvious kind of humor.

Other than that, I really liked it. It felt like the Peter Pan in my head and makes me miss the book. I don't really remember the Disney version or the Mary Martin filmed play that I watched so often in childhood; I don't even remember the book that much, which I read dozens of times. I loved how the movie had a narrator, and small mentions of things like the hidden kiss in Mrs. Darling's mouth that made me remember not the other two movies, but the book. Neverland was spectacularly beautiful and wild. I loved the Darling family, and the people who played Wendy and Captain Hook were particularly good. Especially Wendy, who had to carry the weight of the movie.

And it managed to capture the melancholy of the book, which I don't think the other two movies really did. That was one of the things I liked about Hook (I know, everyone says it's a horrid movie, but I watched it young and in love with Peter Pan). I liked the thought of Wendy growing old and waiting for Peter to come back for her, except he never does.

Love your icon

[identity profile] mamculuna.livejournal.com 2003-12-29 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Haven't seen PP yet, but love the Dream icon--I'm just reading those (the ones I can find, that is)
ext_15252: (ucf)

Peter Pan fan

[identity profile] masqthephlsphr.livejournal.com 2003-12-29 04:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I bought the book--a big 8 1/2" x 11'' illustrated version of the book--a long time ago after seeing "Hook", which I thought was a wonderful sequel to the original story. I also have a little Disney Peter Pan statue. One of his arms broke off so I call him "Peter Pan de Milo". Big Peter Pan fan.

And my heart skipped a beat when I saw the poster of the upcoming live-action movie. Then after seeing the trailer, I decided maybe I wouldn't see it. Something in the trailer, I don't know what, made me think twice. There are plenty of versions of Peter Pan out there to see instead.
ext_15252: (Default)

Who thought "Hook" was bad?

[identity profile] masqthephlsphr.livejournal.com 2003-12-30 06:02 am (UTC)(link)
I loved "Hook"! I was 27 when it came out, and I found it completely charming. I suppose I might have had a different perspective than some of your friends, coming at it from the point of view of an adult who had been in the corporate world. Watching this stiff paunchy adult all caught up in his so-called "real world" job finding out he had this lost identity--Peter Pan of all people! was magical for me.

I've always enjoyed the theme of "discovering your real (magical) identity". My favorite film when I was a kid was "Escape to Witch Mountain" where the kids find out they are really aliens.

And Robin Williams was absolutely great, as was Dustin Hoffman and Julia Roberts and Maggie Smith.

Wee!
ext_15252: (Default)

Re: Who thought "Hook" was bad?

[identity profile] masqthephlsphr.livejournal.com 2003-12-30 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Maggie Smith is Wendy?! That's awesome!! I had no idea!

What's amazing is she was supposed be playing an extremely OLD Wendy thirteen years ago, and now she is playing a vigorous Professor McGonegal in the HP series, and pulling off both well!
ext_15252: (the trio)

I did

[identity profile] masqthephlsphr.livejournal.com 2003-12-31 04:18 am (UTC)(link)
Although my memory of that movie isn't quite in my head. But I see the HP kids loud and clear. I saw the movies before reading the books, so that makes sense.

[identity profile] hermionesviolin.livejournal.com 2003-12-29 05:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think i've ever read the PP book. A book i was reading recently talked about the Oz books which made me want to reread the original and maybe read for the first time some of the sequels. I thought Hook was great and also enjoyed the animated version, which i saw when i was younger. Peter Pan isn't one of those stories that has ever really captured me, though, so i've been rather indifferent to the plethora of adaptations going around recently.

[identity profile] hermionesviolin.livejournal.com 2004-01-05 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, a lot of kids books are (so much) darker than we remember them being. I wonder how much of that is that we didn't notice the darkness at the time, or if we liked it at the time. I have a feeling this'll come up a lot in the 2 fairy tale classes i'm taking next semester.

[identity profile] hermionesviolin.livejournal.com 2004-01-05 03:02 am (UTC)(link)
*looks puzzled* As in, makes you wonder about how sensitive we as adults are to the content in books aimed toward children? (Not sure exactly what you're trying to say in your comment.)

[identity profile] angeyja.livejournal.com 2003-12-29 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
And it managed to capture the melancholy of the book, which I don't think the other two movies really did. That was one of the things I liked about Hook (I know, everyone says it's a horrid movie, but I watched it young and in love with Peter Pan). I liked the thought of Wendy growing old and waiting for Peter to come back for her, except he never does.

Perhaps, not quite everyone. :cheeky grin:

Sooooo, given that he's such a big part of the movie (Jeremy), think it's worth it?